Updated Feb 23, 2026
iGaming Payment Solutions
EuropeLATAMAsiaAfricaNorth AmericaMENACryptoOpen BankingCardsFast SettlementEnterprise
Independent directory of payment providers for iGaming operators. Filter by region, payment type, and license.
Top Rated Providers
Nuvei processes for Bet365, DraftKings and FanDuel. Adyen cleared €1.39 trillion last year. The top of this list isn't populated by startups with nice websites. These are the providers that process real iGaming volume at scale.
Quick Picks
Top providers for specific markets and needs
All Providers
Every provider here actively serves iGaming operators. We verified clients, checked regulatory registries, and tested documentation before including anyone.
Nuvei
ReviewBet365, DraftKings and FanDuel all process through Nuvei. Publicly traded out of Montreal, 7,000+ employees, peaked at $40B valuation. 700+ payment methods a...
Adyen
ReviewAdyen is the largest independent payment processor in Europe. EUR 1.39 trillion processed in 2025, EUR 2.36 billion revenue, publicly traded on Euronext Amst...
IXOPAY
ReviewIXOPAY is a white-label payment orchestration platform built in Vienna since 2014 that handles $40B+ in transactions across 30+ countries. 200+ PSP adapters,...
Solidgate
ReviewOrchestration and direct acquiring in one platform. Solidgate launched in 2019 from Kyiv and now processes 300+ methods across Global, LATAM and APAC markets...
Worldpay
ReviewOwned by FIS, processing card payments since 1997. Ladbrokes and Coral built their online deposit systems on Worldpay. 300+ payment methods focused on UK and...
Triple-A
ReviewTriple-A is the stablecoin payment processor with MAS Singapore licensing, backed by Peak XV Partners and Razer's zVentures with $14 million raised. Built by...
Trustly
ReviewTrustly is the open banking payment method that every major European casino already offers. Bet365, Flutter, Kindred, Betsson, Entain, LeoVegas. If your play...
Finera
ReviewFinera is a payment orchestration platform built for iGaming and high-risk merchants. London-based, founded 2021, 85+ employees. Connects operators to 600+ p...
Primer
ReviewPrimer is the best-funded payment orchestration platform in our database. $74.1M raised from Tencent, Balderton Capital and others at a $425M valuation. Lond...
AstroPay
ReviewAstroPay is an e-wallet built to get casino deposits through in Latin America, where 40-60% of international card payments get declined by local banks. Based...
Corefy
ReviewCorefy is a payment orchestration platform out of London with R&D in Kyiv, running since 2018 under the PayCore.io name before rebranding in 2021. 600+ ready...
Paysafe
ReviewWith 50 million active Skrill and Neteller wallet users already onboard, Paysafe offers something no other iGaming PSP can match: a built-in player base. Par...
NOWPayments
ReviewWith 425+ cryptocurrencies at 0.5 to 1% per transaction, NOWPayments handles what fiat-only PSPs cannot: getting crypto deposits live in minutes, not weeks. ...
CoinGate
ReviewCoinGate is a Lithuanian crypto payment gateway that became the first homegrown Lithuanian company to receive a MiCA license in December 2025. 70+ cryptocurr...
BitPay
ReviewBitPay is the oldest Bitcoin payment processor, running since 2011 out of Atlanta with $70M+ in venture funding. 100+ cryptocurrencies, 130,000 merchants, $1...
Brite
ReviewBrite is the Stockholm-built open banking challenger going after Trustly's territory. Founded in 2019 by a former Klarna director, backed by $60 million from...
Inpay
ReviewInpay is a Danish payout specialist that moves money to players in 90+ countries through local bank rails. Founded in 2008 in Copenhagen, bootstrapped to EUR...
CoinsPaid
ReviewCoinsPaid is the crypto payment processor that 500+ online casinos already use, processing EUR 9.1 billion in 2024. Built in Estonia with SoftSwiss and Slote...
CoinPayments
ReviewCoinPayments is the oldest surviving multi-crypto payment gateway, running since 2013 with support for 2,300+ cryptocurrencies. 250,000+ merchants across 190...
PayRetailers
ReviewFounded in Sao Paulo in 2018, PayRetailers aggregates 100+ local payment methods across Latin America through direct acquiring. No wallet, no player registra...
Top 10 iGaming Payment Providers Compared
Ranked by integration quality, fees, coverage, and compliance
| Provider | Coverage | Methods | Speed | Trustpilot | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Nuvei Full-Stack PSPGL·T+7+ | GL | 700+ | T+7+ | 3.6 | 8.3 | Review |
| 02 | Adyen Enterprise PSPGL·T+2-3 | GL | 250+ | T+2-3 | 1.3 | 8.2 | Review |
| 03 | IXOPAY Payment OrchestratorEU, NA, LA, AS·Varies | EUNALAAS | 200+ | Varies | 3.2 | 8.0 | Review |
| 04 | Solidgate Orchestration + AcquiringEU, NA, LA, AS·T+1 | EUNALAAS | 300+ | T+1 | — | 7.5 | Review |
| 05 | Worldpay Card Acquiring PSPEU, NA, AS, ME·T+7+ | EUNAASME | 300+ | T+7+ | 4.3 | 7.3 | Review |
| 06 | Triple-A Crypto-to-FiatAS, EU, GL·Instant | ASEUGL | 10+ | Instant | 3.8 | 7.2 | Review |
| 07 | Trustly Open Banking PSPEU·T+1 | EU | — | T+1 | 2.6 | 7.2 | Review |
| 08 | Finera Payment OrchestratorEU·Varies | EU | 600+ | Varies | 3.7 | 7.2 | Review |
| 09 | Primer Payment OrchestratorEU, NA, AS·Varies | EUNAAS | 200+ | Varies | 1.4 | 7.2 | Review |
| 10 | AstroPay Local Methods PSPLA, AS, AF·T+1 | LAASAF | 50+ | T+1 | 4.4 | 7.1 | Review |
Explore by Category
Operators ask us 'what's the difference between a PSP and an orchestrator' more than any other question. The short version: a PSP moves money between your player and your bank. An orchestrator decides which PSP handles each transaction.
Payment Solutions by Region
PSD2 killed card conversion in Europe. LATAM banks decline 40-60% of international cards. Each region has a payment problem and a set of providers that solve it.
Card conversion in European iGaming dropped after PSD2 forced Strong Customer Authentication on every deposit. Open banking filled the gap. Trustly processes for Bet365, Flutter, Betsson and most major European operators. Brite is the newer Stockholm-built alternative pushing instant payouts. Outside of open banking, country-level preferences run the show: iDEAL in the Netherlands, Sofort in Germany, Swish in Sweden, Bancontact in Belgium. A provider that covers ‘Europe’ but only does cards is missing half the deposit volume.
How We Score Providers
Six metrics, all from public data
Every provider in this directory gets a score from 1 to 10. The score is based on six metrics, all pulled from public data: provider websites, regulatory registries, and API documentation. No provider can pay to change their score.
Does the provider serve iGaming as a primary vertical? We check for dedicated iGaming teams, pre-built casino platform connectors (SoftSwiss, EveryMatrix, Slotegrator), named gambling clients, and whether their product roadmap prioritizes operator needs. A provider with 500+ gambling clients and 6 platform connectors scores higher than one that lists iGaming as an afterthought.
Where does the provider actually have local acquiring or direct integrations? We parse region descriptions and verify against supported currency lists and documentation. Global coverage with 50+ local markets scores highest. A LATAM-only specialist gets credit for depth in that region but lower marks for overall reach.
Tier-1 licenses carry the most weight: MGA, FCA, UKGC. PCI DSS Level 1 is expected at this level. We also check for KYC/AML automation, chargeback protection tools, and whether the provider supports operators under specific gambling regulatory frameworks. Providers with multiple jurisdictional approvals score higher.
Lower published fees score higher. We parse actual fee percentages from provider data. A 0.5% deposit fee scores better than 3.5%. Transparent pricing models get a bonus over opaque 'contact sales' approaches. Note: orchestrators show only routing fees, not underlying PSP costs, which can inflate this score.
Single API integration with full sandbox scores highest. We check documentation quality, SDK availability, pre-built connectors, and realistic onboarding timelines. A provider that gets you live in 1 week with excellent docs scores better than one requiring 8 weeks of custom engineering.
Trustpilot rating multiplied by 2 to convert from a 5-point to 10-point scale. A 4.4/5 Trustpilot becomes 8.8/10. Providers with no Trustpilot presence default to 5.0. We note sample sizes because 14 reviews means something different than 9,650.
The final score is a weighted average across all six metrics. We update scores quarterly or when a provider launches a significant product change.
Featured placements are paid. Scores are independent and not influenced by commercial relationships.
Understanding iGaming Payment Solutions
The iGaming payment space has four types of providers, and they do different things.
Payment Service Providers (PSPs) handle the full transaction, moving money from the player's card or wallet all the way to the operator's bank account. Paysafe, Nuvei, and Worldpay are PSPs. They own the relationship with acquiring banks and card networks, which means they take on the risk and charge accordingly.
Payment Gateways sit between the operator's platform and one or more processors. They route transactions but don't process them directly. A gateway works like a switchboard, sending each transaction to the best available processor based on region, payment method, or success rate. Adyen and Worldpay operate partly as gateways alongside their acquiring business.
Payment Orchestrators go a step further than gateways. Platforms like Corefy, Finera, Primer, and IXOPAY connect to hundreds of PSPs, gateways, and processors through a single API. The operator integrates once and gets access to multiple providers, with smart routing that automatically picks the best path for each transaction. Orchestration matters when you're operating in 10+ markets with different payment preferences in each.
Payment Processors handle the actual movement of money between banks. They're the backend infrastructure. Most operators don't work with processors directly. Instead, they access processing through a PSP or gateway. Solidgate is an example of a company that offers both direct acquiring and orchestration for iGaming.
The lines between these categories blur. Nuvei is a PSP that also does orchestration. Corefy orchestrates but also processes. When you're evaluating providers, focus less on what they call themselves and more on what they actually do for your specific setup.
Common Payment Challenges in iGaming
Payments in iGaming are harder than payments in regular e-commerce. Three reasons.
First, chargebacks. iGaming has some of the highest chargeback rates of any industry. Players dispute deposits after losing. Card networks monitor chargeback ratios closely, and if an operator crosses the threshold (typically 1% of transactions), they risk losing their merchant account entirely. Every provider handles chargebacks differently. Some offer prevention tools, some offer insurance, some just pass the cost to you.
Second, getting a merchant account in the first place. Most acquiring banks consider online gambling high-risk. That limits which processors will work with you, and the ones that will charge higher fees and impose rolling reserves (holding 5-10% of your processing volume for 6+ months as security). This is why iGaming-specific providers exist. They've built relationships with acquiring banks that understand the industry.
Third, compliance keeps changing. The EU's Sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive added new requirements for transaction monitoring. The UK's Gambling Commission updated its rules on affordability checks, which directly affect payment flows. Brazil just launched its regulatory framework. Every market has its own rules, and your payment provider needs to keep up. Otherwise, you're the one paying fines.
Beyond these three, there are practical problems: multi-currency conversion costs eating into margins, slow settlement times tying up working capital, and player verification requirements that add friction to the deposit flow and kill conversion rates.
Choosing the Right Payment Solution
There's no single best provider. The right choice depends on where you operate, what your players expect, and how much volume you're processing.
Start with geography. If you're launching in Brazil, you need a provider with native Pix support, not one that routes Pix through a third-party aggregator. If you're in the Nordics, open banking through Trustly or Brite will convert better than card payments. If you're US-only, your provider list is short because few processors serve regulated US gambling.
Then look at your player base. Recreational casino players in Europe expect Visa and Mastercard. High-volume sports bettors in Asia use local bank transfers. Crypto-native players want Bitcoin deposits with instant confirmation. The payment methods your provider supports determine whether players actually complete their first deposit.
Volume matters for pricing. A startup processing €100K per month pays different rates than an operator doing €10M. Most PSPs have tiered pricing that drops as volume increases. Some charge flat percentage fees, others add per-transaction costs. Get quotes from at least three providers before committing.
Finally, think about what happens when things go wrong. Your provider's chargeback handling, fraud prevention, and customer support matter more than their marketing page. Ask for chargeback rates across their iGaming portfolio. Ask how fast their support responds to MID-related emergencies. Ask what happens to your funds if they decide to terminate your account.
We built this directory so operators can compare these factors without calling 30 sales teams. Use the filters, check the profiles, and make a shortlist based on data, not pitch decks.
FAQ
Built from real conversations with operators. Not the questions providers wish you'd ask.