Skip to content

77 providers

Latpay

Latpay Review

Is It the Right Payment Solution for Your iGaming Business?

Adequate

High-Risk PSPVerified
Visit Latpay
By the Editorial Team ·

Latpay is a 25-year-old high-risk payment service provider operating under Lateral Payment Solutions Pty Ltd (AFSL 521901, ASIC-regulated). Founded in 2001 with offices in London and Southport, Queensland, the company specializes in iGaming, sportsbook, bingo, lottery, forex and travel, the verticals that mainstream PSPs price out or refuse outright. The headline asset is a payment hub aggregating 80-90+ gambling-friendly acquiring banks and 30+ alternative payment methods, processing in 140-150+ currencies with settlement in 26. Cascading smart routing is the differentiator: when an acquirer declines a transaction, Latpay reroutes it through the next bank in the chain in real time. PCI DSS Level 1, BACS Direct Debit Bureau accredited in the UK. The catch is everything that is missing: no MGA or UKGC gambling-tier license, no pre-built connectors for SoftSwiss, EveryMatrix, Bragg or Slotegrator, no crypto, no responsible-gaming API, and no public Trustpilot or G2 footprint to compare against. Better fit for emerging-market or higher-risk gambling traffic than for a regulated EU casino consolidating onto a single Tier-1 PSP.

Founded London, UK30+ Payment MethodsCustom Settlement
High-Risk iGamingCascading RoutingNot a fit: Tier-1 ScaleNot a fit: Platform Connectors
#80+ Gambling Banks#Since 2001#AFSL 521901#Cascading Routing#30+ APMs#PCI DSS Level 1

What operators ask about Latpay

What is Latpay?

A 25-year-old high-risk PSP (Lateral Payment Solutions, AFSL 521901, ASIC-regulated) run from London and Queensland: a payment hub aggregating 80-90+ gambling-friendly acquiring banks and 30+ APMs for iGaming, sportsbook, bingo, lottery and forex.

More in Product

Is Latpay safe?

At the infrastructure level, yes: PCI DSS Level 1, an ASIC-supervised AFSL, UK BACS Bureau accreditation, tokenized PAN storage and 3D-Secure.

More in Compliance

What does Latpay cost?

Custom tiered pricing with no rate card; a realistic working assumption is 2-5% on card deposits with a rolling reserve in the 5-15% range.

More in Pricing

Quick Info

Type
High-Risk PSP
Founded
2001
HQ
London, UK
Pricing
Custom
APMs
30+
Settlement
Custom
6.0
Adequate

iGaming Score

iGaming Fit
6.0
Geographic Coverage
6.5
Security & Compliance
6.5
Fees & Pricing
5.5
Tech & Integration
5.0
User Trust
5.0
Visit Latpay

Our iGaming Score: 6.0/10

Weighted scoring across five criteria

CriterionWeightScoreRating
iGaming Fit

17 years of iGaming-specific positioning inside a company running since 2001, with casino, sportsbook, bingo and lottery all on the gambling product page and an 80+ gambling-friendly bank network behind it. No MGA, UKGC or Curaçao gambling license, no SoftSwiss or EveryMatrix connectors, no responsible-gaming API.

30%6.0Adequate
Geographic Coverage

Australia, the UK and Canada as primary operating markets, with 140+ processing currencies and 26 settlement currencies reached through 80+ acquirers. No published country count, and no deep LATAM or APAC local-method specialization.

22%6.5Adequate
Security & Compliance

AFSL 521901 (ASIC), FCA API ref 912498 (UK), PCI DSS Level 1, BACS-accredited Direct Debit Bureau (UK). No gambling-tier regulator licensing. Cascading + 3DS + tokenization + manual review. No published ML fraud model

20%6.5Adequate
Fees & Pricing

Custom transaction-based, tiered by volume and region. No public rate card. Higher-risk segment pricing typically lands above mainstream PSP rates

16%5.5Adequate
Tech & Integration

REST API + Hosted Page + Embedded Form, documented on Speca.io. CMS plugins for WooCommerce/Magento/OpenCart/Joomla. No mobile SDK. No iGaming platform connectors. Adequate but not class-leading developer experience

12%5.0Adequate
User Trust

No Trustpilot, G2 or Capterra profile. Minimal public review surface, typical for niche B2B specialists but limiting on social proof. A niche-specialist signal rather than a scale signal

0%5.0Adequate
Overall100%6.0Adequate

We score each provider on 5 weighted criteria using a 1 to 10 scale. iGaming Fit carries the most weight at 30% because that is what matters most for gambling operators. Geographic Coverage gets 22%. Security & Compliance gets 20%. Fees & Pricing gets 16%. Tech & Integration gets 12%. The final score is a weighted average of those 5. Trustpilot is shown for context but carries no weight, since player reviews of casinos are not a read on B2B acquiring quality.

Score Explanation

Latpay is a niche specialist and the scores read that way rather than as a scale tier. Geographic Coverage and Security share the highest mark. The geographic side rests on 140+ processing currencies and 26 settlement currencies reached through the acquirer network, but it is breadth without depth: no LATAM local-method specialization of the PayRetailers or AstroPay kind, no APAC local-rail work comparable to what EBANX does in Brazil. Security is carried by licenses held in Latpay's own name: the FCA Authorised Payment Institution registration in the UK and the AFSL under ASIC both count, with PCI DSS Level 1 and BACS accreditation behind them, while the gambling-compliance layer is still missing entirely. iGaming Fit is close behind and is the dimension that actually matters here, because gambling has been the named focus for 17 years and the gambling-friendly acquirer network is the real product asset; what caps it is the complete absence of gambling regulator licensing, whether MGA, UKGC gambling tier, Curaçao, Isle of Man or US state. Fees cannot be scored confidently against a published rate card that does not exist. Tech sits mid-pack: the API and CMS plugins work, but there is no mobile SDK and no iGaming platform pre-builds. User Trust ties Tech at the bottom on zero Trustpilot reviews, no G2 profile and no Capterra rating, which is normal for a niche B2B specialist and still a real gap for a procurement team weighing social proof.

Who Is Latpay Best For?

The operator profiles that fit, and the ones that do not

Recommended For

  • Emerging-market gambling traffic that Tier-1 PSPs decline. Gambling traffic that mainstream PSPs price out or refuse is the core case. Latpay's pitch to the underwriting team is that gambling is the business rather than a risk category to be managed around, and the 80+ acquiring bank network is curated for gambling-friendly underwriting, so the merchant does not get bounced six weeks into KYB because an acquirer's risk appetite shifted.
  • Operators recovering revenue from cascading routing. Declines are where the money is on high-risk card volume. Cascading reroutes a declined card to the next acquirer in the chain in real time, behind the same merchant-side request, and recovering even 10-15% of declines on a $1M monthly card book is $100-150k of additional accepted volume. Tier-1 PSPs offer equivalents (Nuvei's smart routing, Worldpay's intelligent acceptance) at higher minimums and longer onboarding.
  • Australian and UK merchants needing AFSL-regulated rails. An Australian-incorporated merchant gets something specific here: AFSL 521901 under ASIC changes the regulatory reporting position in a way a foreign PSP cannot. The UK side adds BACS Direct Debit Bureau accreditation, which means native direct-debit processing for UK subscription or VIP-deposit flows rather than a partner hop.
  • High-risk verticals beyond gambling (forex, travel). Forex, travel, adult and nutraceutical merchants get the same specialist underwriting without needing the gambling-license layer that is missing. Twenty-five years of accumulated relationships with high-risk acquiring banks is the asset, and for a merchant whose own compliance posture sits between fully regulated and aggressive grey market, that pragmatism usually beats a Tier-1 PSP's compliance-first posture.

Not Recommended For

  • Tier-1 regulated casinos consolidating onto a single PSP. Regulated EU or UK casinos consolidating onto one Tier-1 PSP will not find the compliance layer here. Latpay holds no MGA, UKGC gambling-tier, Curaçao or Isle of Man license and publishes no responsible-gaming API, so a UKGC operation would be assembling that layer itself, which defeats the point of consolidating. Nuvei, Paysafe or Worldpay are the answers instead.
  • Crypto-first gambling platforms. There is zero native crypto: no Bitcoin, no Ethereum, no stablecoins, no on-ramp or off-ramp. For operators where crypto deposits run 20-40% of volume, typical at international casinos targeting Asia and LATAM, Latpay handles the fiat side only. Pair with CoinsPaid, NOWPayments or BitPay and accept a second KYB, a second reconciliation and a second dashboard.
  • US-regulated sports betting. US-regulated sports betting is out of reach: there are no US state gambling authorizations. DraftKings, FanDuel and BetMGM route through Nuvei precisely because Nuvei holds the state stack. Latpay's North American presence is high-risk-merchant-grade rather than regulated-gambling-grade.
  • SoftSwiss / EveryMatrix-native operators. Casinos on SoftSwiss, EveryMatrix, Bragg, Altenar, BetConstruct or Slotegrator that expect a pre-built payment connector will not get one. Paysafe reaches SoftSwiss and EveryMatrix through its wallet brands; Latpay reaches none of them, so the platform-side bridge is custom work that eats 2-3 weeks of the otherwise-fast 1-3 week integration and leaves maintenance on the operator's engineers.
  • Buying committees that weight public social proof. Procurement teams that weight public social proof will find nothing to weigh: no Trustpilot profile, no G2 listing, no Capterra rating. Typical for a niche B2B specialist, but if the buying committee includes a CFO who wants third-party validation rather than reference calls, the footprint is too thin.

Geographic Coverage

Per-market verdict, regions, and market focus

One provider, two answers. The verdict flips depending on who is asking, and that is the point. The overall score rates the company. This rates the fit for your market.

Offshore operator

Curaçao / Anjouan license, serving grey and restricted markets.

Limited at best, in 12 markets.

Licensed operator

Holds the local license in a regulated market.

Won't serve this profile.

Market-by-market verdict

No market reaches Solid for an offshore operator; the strongest cells below are Limited.

24 Limited
MarketCasinoSportsbook
AT Austria
Limited44

Provider-claimed

Limited41

Provider-claimed

FI Finland
Limited44

Provider-claimed

Limited44

Provider-claimed

BR Brazil
Limited41

Provider-claimed

Limited41

Provider-claimed

MX Mexico
Limited41

Provider-claimed

Limited41

Provider-claimed

CL Chile
Limited41

Provider-claimed

Limited41

Provider-claimed

CO Colombia
Limited41

Provider-claimed

Limited41

Provider-claimed

AR Argentina
Limited41

Provider-claimed

Limited41

Provider-claimed

NL Netherlands
Limited41

Provider-claimed

Limited41

Provider-claimed

PT Portugal
Limited41

Provider-claimed

Limited41

Provider-claimed

CH Switzerland
Limited41

Provider-claimed

Limited41

Provider-claimed

The tier is the verdict. The small number orders providers inside a tier; it is not a provider-level score. The grey line under each verdict is the evidence grade: Verified means named clients we can point to, Register-verified means the entry stands in a regulator's own register, Trade-known means known in the trade, Provider-claimed means the provider's word, discounted in the math. Full method on our methodology page.

Regions

  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Oceania
  • North America
  • Latin America

Coverage Analysis

The primary operating markets are Australia, the UK and Canada, the three jurisdictions Latpay explicitly cites in its 'leading Payment and Merchant Service Provider' positioning. Australian operations run under AFSL 521901 issued by ASIC. UK operations include BACS-accredited Direct Debit Bureau status, which matters for native processing of UK direct-debit recurring transactions. The Canadian presence is referenced but less specifically defined. Through the payment-hub model, Latpay processes for merchants in 140-150+ currencies and settles in 26, with the gambling-product page mentioning 14 settlement currencies specifically for gaming clients. Coverage is broad rather than deep: there is no LATAM specialization like PayRetailers or AstroPay deliver (no PIX-depth, no OXXO connector), and the APAC coverage isn't specialized at the local-method level the way EBANX is for Brazil. The right way to think about Latpay's geography is global high-risk merchant acquiring through 80+ banks rather than deep local-method coverage region by region.

Regional Breakdown

For an iGaming operator the geographic question often reduces to where you need direct local-method depth versus generalist card-rail processing, and Latpay sits firmly on the card-rail side. UK card volume goes through partner acquirers in the 80+ network rather than direct acquiring under Latpay's own bank-membership (compare Ecommpay, which is a Principal Member of Visa and Mastercard with direct UK acquiring). Europe is processed but isn't a stated strength, so for European A2A volume the right answer is Trustly or Brite. Asia gets card processing but no Hong Kong FPS, GCash or PromptPay specialization like Ecommpay or Nuvei publish. LATAM coverage exists at the card and APM level (ELO, Cabal documented) but doesn't approach a regional specialist. The pattern is to use Latpay for high-risk gambling card and APM acquiring across the bank network and add a regional or method specialist where you need local-rail depth.

Key Features for iGaming Operators

Products, payment methods, and verticals

Key Products

Payment Gateway, Cascading (smart routing), Tokenization, Fraud Screening, Alternative Payments, mPOS, Hosted Payment Page

Five product groups under one Latpay merchant relationship. The Payment Gateway is the core product, a PCI Level 1 multi-currency gateway processing through 80-90+ acquiring banks and 30+ APMs. Cascading is the routing layer that reroutes declines to alternate acquirers in real time, marketed as an 'intelligent bank switch' and the headline conversion-recovery feature. Tokenization replaces card PANs with random tokens in a secure vault. Fraud Management runs real-time screening plus client-configurable rule sets plus specialist manual review. Alternative Payments cover the 30+ APMs (bank transfers, pre-paid, local cards, e-wallets, cash vouchers). An mPOS product for in-person card acceptance exists as a separate app, relevant for retail merchants but not for online gambling. Hosted Payment Page and Embedded UI Checkout cover the integration surface. Operators get a single merchant portal for reporting, reconciliation, dispute management and audit trails.

Payment Methods

Cards (Visa and Mastercard, with 3D-Secure via Verified by Visa and Mastercard SecureCode) plus 30+ alternative payment methods aggregated under one API. Specific APMs documented in the public Akurateco connector definition include Cabal (Argentinian debit/credit), ELO (Brazilian domestic card brand), Entercash (Germany, Austria, Finland, Sweden), Skrill (global e-wallet) and Neteller (gambling-friendly wallet with deposits from cards or bank transfer). Latpay groups the APMs into real-time bank transfers, pre-paid solutions, local card networks, e-wallets and cash vouchers. No native Apple Pay or Google Pay support is documented, and no crypto, where the gap is real and explicit. On raw method counts, Nuvei publishes 720+, Ecommpay 180+, and Latpay 30+ APMs plus cards. The headline differentiator isn't method count but the 80-90+ acquiring-bank breadth on the back end, since when a merchant gets onboarded onto Latpay, the decline-rate optimization across multiple acquirers is the operational gain.

Verticals

iGaming is the headline vertical, with casino, sportsbook, bingo and lottery all on the gambling product page. Forex and travel are listed as adjacent high-risk verticals, with eCommerce more broadly. The company has been processing since 2001, and its Gaming page dates the iGaming-specific track record at over 17 years. In practice this means the team that handles your merchant account is experienced with gambling chargebacks, gambling KYC patterns, jurisdictional player-funds segregation questions and the specific underwriting friction high-risk merchants hit. The trade-off is that this experience does not translate to gambling regulator licensing on Latpay's side, because Latpay isn't a regulated gambling operator but a payment processor serving regulated gambling operators. For operators where 'I want a PSP whose team understands my business' is the real ask, Latpay delivers. For operators where 'I want a PSP whose compliance stack mirrors my gambling license requirements' is the ask, the answer is a different PSP.

  • iGaming
  • Forex
  • Travel
  • eCommerce
  • High-risk merchants
Methods
30+
Crypto
None
Currencies
140-150+ processing currencies, 26 settlement currencies
iGaming
0
FeatureStatusDetails
Deposit ProcessingAvailable30+ payment methods, Instant
Withdrawal / PayoutAvailableVaries by destination rail
Instant WithdrawalsNot availableVaries by destination rail
KYC / AML Built-inAvailableSemi-auto
Chargeback ProtectionNot availableMerchant
Multi-CurrencyAvailable140-150+ processing currencies, 26 settlement currencies
API IntegrationAvailableREST API + Hosted Page + Embedded Form
Local Payment MethodsAvailableLocal rails in 12 markets
iGaming SpecializationAvailable80+ gambling-friendly acquiring banks, cascading smart routing, 17 years of iGaming specialization, AFSL and FCA regulated
Geographic CoverageAvailableAvailable across Europe, Asia-Pacific, Oceania, North America, Latin America

Pricing & Fee Structure

Fee structure and pricing model

Rate Card

Custom
Deposit Fee

Custom (transaction-based, tiered)

Withdrawal Fee

Custom

Settlement

Custom

Methods

30+

Setup / Monthly

Not published

Integration Fee

Not published

Revenue Share

No

Pricing Details

All custom and tiered. Latpay uses transaction-based pricing with rates varying by volume and region, structured to fit higher-risk verticals where mainstream PSP rate cards don't apply. There is no public rate card. The merchant flow runs application form, then technical information form, then KYB and compliance review, then a tailored quote. A realistic working assumption for an iGaming operator: deposit rates land in the 2-5% range on card volume (above mainstream eCommerce PSP rates because gambling is a higher-risk MCC), rolling reserve terms in the 5-15% range held for 3-6 months (negotiated case-by-case based on chargeback history and merchant tenure), and FX markups in the 1-3% range typical for higher-risk multi-currency processing. Setup fees, integration fees and monthly minimums are not published. Compared to Tier-1 enterprise PSPs (Nuvei, Adyen, Worldpay) where Interchange++ pricing is the norm, Latpay's blended-tier model is more typical of the high-risk segment where operators can't qualify for Interchange++ in the first place. Compared to other high-risk specialists (CommerceGate, eMerchantPay, Pay4Fun), the structure is similar: no published rates, custom per merchant, higher than mainstream but lower than the predatory tier of some emerging-market high-risk processors.

Speed & Settlement

Transaction processing and settlement timelines

Deposit

Instant

Player-initiated
Withdrawal

Varies by destination rail

Operator payout
Settlement

Custom

To operator account
Currencies

26 settlement currencies (14 major currencies referenced on the gaming product page). Processing in 140-150+ currencies.

Settlement options
Refund ProcessingStandard card-rail timing (3-7 business days, dependent on issuer)

Card deposits process instantly on supported card schemes (Visa, Mastercard). APM deposit speeds depend on the underlying rail, where bank transfers and real-time payments authorize within minutes and pre-paid and voucher methods clear within the timeframe of the customer's funding action. Withdrawal speed varies by destination: card payouts via Visa Direct or Mastercard Send (where supported) clear within minutes to a few hours, bank transfer payouts run on local rails (next-day to T+2 depending on jurisdiction), and e-wallet payouts (Skrill, Neteller) are typically instant. Settlement to the merchant account is custom-negotiated and not publicly published, since high-risk merchant accounts typically run T+2 to T+7 with rolling reserve withheld. Refunds follow standard card-rail timing of 3-7 business days dependent on issuer behavior. None of this is class-leading. Tier-1 PSPs like Ecommpay, Adyen and Checkout.com hit T+1 to T+3 reliably for lower-risk eCommerce volume, Brite delivers T+0 same-day for European A2A specifically, and Nuvei runs T+2 to T+7 on its iGaming book. Latpay's settlement profile lands within the high-risk segment norm rather than ahead of it. For operators where settlement timing materially affects working capital, the answer is to negotiate the reserve and the settlement window explicitly during the merchant agreement phase rather than expecting published terms.

Integration & Tech

Developer experience and technical capabilities

API Type
REST API + Hosted Page + Embedded Form
Onboarding
2-6 weeks
Sandbox
Sandbox environment provided. Sandbox base URL is supplied on merchant signup. API documentation hosted on Speca.io (speca.io/latpay).
Mobile SDK
No
White-Label
Hosted Payment Page (LPS Gateway Hosted Payment Page) supports customization. Embedded Form (Embedded UI Checkout) hosts the card-entry UI on Latpay's side to keep merchants out of PCI scope.
Docs Quality
Adequate

Integration Time

1-3 weeks

View API Documentation

Integration Assessment

Two API paths. The Hosted Payment Page redirects the customer to a Latpay-hosted form (lowest PCI scope, fastest integration, most-customizable branding through the LPS Gateway HPP product). The Embedded UI Checkout renders the card-entry form on the merchant page but tokenizes the card details client-side so the merchant server never sees a PAN, a fully PCI-compliant integration without bringing the merchant into PCI scope. Both are documented on Speca.io (speca.io/latpay). Server-to-server API endpoints handle the authorization, capture, refund and void flow, with webhooks for asynchronous transaction state updates. CMS plugins exist for WooCommerce, Magento, OpenCart and Joomla VirtueMart, distributed through each platform's marketplace rather than a unified developer portal. There is no native iOS or Android SDK published, which is a real gap for operators with mobile-first apps, and no public GitHub organization, so code samples are not open-sourced. A sandbox environment is available with a separate base URL provided on merchant signup. The integration timeline is realistically 1-3 weeks after KYB approval, and the underwriting and acquirer-routing setup takes longer for first-time high-risk merchants than the technical work itself.

Risk & Compliance

Licensing, fraud prevention, and regulatory compliance

KYC/AML Automation
Available. Semi-auto
Chargeback Protection
Not available. Merchant
Licenses
FCA Authorised Payment Institution FRN 912498 (UK), AFSL 521901 (Australia), PCI DSS Level 1, BACS Direct Debit Bureau (UK)
Fraud Prevention
Real-time rule screening, cascading retries, tokenization, 3-D Secure
Responsible Gaming
No
Tokenization
PCI-compliant vault holds the PAN and returns a random token to the merchant. The published encryption stack is DUKPT with 3DES, which is the legacy card-terminal key scheme: 3DES has been disallowed for new applications since 2023, so ask what protects the online vault today.
Dispute Resolution
Merchant support team handles disputes via merchant portal

Compliance Context

PCI DSS Level 1 service provider, the highest service-provider tier, audited annually. Australian Financial Services License number 521901 issued by ASIC to Lateral Payment Solutions Pty Ltd. BACS Direct Debit Bureau accredited in the UK. The tokenization stack is documented as including DUKPT (Derived Unique Key Per Transaction) and 3DES, meaning card details get encrypted with rotating per-transaction keys and are never stored as PAN in merchant systems. 3D-Secure via Verified by Visa and Mastercard SecureCode shifts chargeback liability to the issuer for authenticated transactions. The Cascading and intelligent-bank-switch architecture also has a fraud-prevention angle, since when a transaction is declined the routing layer can apply different acquirer-specific fraud rules on the retry, which both improves acceptance and exposes more fraud signals to the screening layer. The conspicuous absence is that there is no published machine-learning fraud model, no graph-analysis engine, and no third-party fraud-vendor partnership (Sift, Forter, Riskified) named in marketing materials. The fraud stack appears to be real-time rules plus tokenization plus 3DS plus manual review by a specialist team, adequate for high-risk gambling acquiring but less sophisticated than Ecommpay's RCMS or the proprietary engines at Tier-1 PSPs.

Regulatory Position

Australian Financial Services License number 521901 held by Lateral Payment Solutions Pty Ltd, regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). PCI DSS Level 1 service provider, the highest tier of payment-card-industry data-security standard, audited annually. FCA Authorised Payment Institution in the UK (reference 912498, Lateral Payment Solutions Ltd), plus BACS Direct Debit Bureau accreditation for direct-debit processing under the BACS scheme. 3D-Secure supported via Verified by Visa and Mastercard SecureCode. There is no gambling-specific regulator licensing: Latpay holds no Malta Gaming Authority, UK Gambling Commission gambling-tier, Curaçao eGaming, Isle of Man, Kahnawake or US state gambling licenses. Operators retain full responsibility for their own gambling license obligations including responsible-gaming controls, jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction reporting and player-funds segregation. Chargeback liability sits with the merchant per industry standard for high-risk PSPs.

About Latpay: Company Background

Company and product information

Company Name
Latpay
Headquarters
London, UK
Founded
2001
Employees
Not publicly disclosed. Roughly 15 staff are discoverable on LinkedIn, consistent with a sub-50-person company. Two offices: London (The Old Church, Quicks Road, SW19 1EX) and Southport, Queensland (222 Ferry Road), with a Canadian presence referenced but undocumented.
Company Type
Private
Product Type
High-Risk PSP
Licenses
FCA Authorised Payment Institution FRN 912498 (UK), AFSL 521901 (Australia), PCI DSS Level 1, BACS Direct Debit Bureau (UK)
Key Products
Payment Gateway, Cascading (smart routing), Tokenization, Fraud Screening, Alternative Payments, mPOS, Hosted Payment Page
Website
latpay.com
Supported Verticals
iGaming, Forex, Travel, eCommerce, High-risk merchants
Integration Type
REST API + Hosted Page + Embedded Form
Settlement Speed
Custom
Onboarding Speed
2-6 weeks
Named iGaming Clients
Not published

Company History

Founded in 2001 as Lateral Payment Solutions, based in London, when online payment gateways were still novel and the iGaming sector was actively looking for processors willing to underwrite gambling merchants. The company positioned itself early on as serving 'international clients whose services had a high risk of fraud', meaning gambling, forex and travel, and built its acquiring-bank network around gambling-friendly underwriting rather than chasing mainstream eCommerce volume.

Lateral Payment Solutions Pty Ltd is the Australian entity (a separate legal vehicle) holding Australian Financial Services License 521901 issued by ASIC. The London operation runs from The Old Church, Quicks Road, SW19 1EX, and the Australian office is at 222 Ferry Road, Southport, QLD 4215, with Canadian operations referenced but with less public detail. Over the years the company achieved PCI DSS Level 1 service-provider status, BACS Direct Debit Bureau accreditation in the UK, and built up the 80-90+ gambling-friendly acquiring bank network that remains the headline product asset.

Current state (2026): privately held, no funding rounds on Crunchbase, a small specialist team (only ~15 employees discoverable on LinkedIn, consistent with a sub-50-person company), and a niche high-risk merchant book concentrated in iGaming, forex and travel. The product roadmap has been steady rather than disruptive, with Cascading, Tokenization, Embedded Checkout and mPOS representing the visible evolution. There is no public funding history, no acquisition activity, and no leadership change anywhere in industry coverage. The competitive position is long-tenured high-risk specialist rather than scaling Tier-1 PSP.

What Users Say About Latpay

What the review record shows, and what it does not

Trustpilot Presence

Latpay has no public Trustpilot profile at audit time.

Client Evidence

No public client list is published. The 'Industry Partners' page references unnamed iGaming operators across casino, sportsbook, bingo and lottery, plus forex and travel merchants, but specific named clients comparable to Ecommpay citing Accor Hotels or Nuvei citing DraftKings are not in the public marketing surface. The B2B PSP convention of confidential client lists applies, and the high-risk specialist segment is even more discreet than mainstream PSPs. For procurement teams that need verified references this means reference-call requests run through the merchant onboarding team rather than a public client-logo deck.

Operational Details

Business terms, contracts, and support

Dedicated Account Manager
Yes
Minimum Monthly Volume
No published minimum. Marketing copy promotes 'sign up in less than 3 minutes' for general merchants, but high-risk iGaming onboarding involves a fuller KYB review before pricing is quoted.
Contract Lock-In
Not published
Migration Support
Yes
Min/Max Transaction
Not published
Mass Payouts
Single + batch (gaming withdrawals) · No published limit
Biometric / One-Click
No
Reporting
Merchant portal with transaction reporting and audit trails

Long-tenured Australian and UK high-risk PSP that has specialized in gambling payments since 2001, run by a team small enough that the people writing the merchant agreement are reachable by the people handling chargebacks. The asset is the acquirer network, 80+ gambling-friendly banks with cascading retries across them, which for a card book with high-risk decline rates is a direct revenue lever rather than a feature. Two regulated entities sit behind it: Lateral Payment Solutions Limited as an FCA Authorised Payment Institution (FRN 912498) and Lateral Payment Solutions Pty Ltd under AFSL 521901. Everything commercial is negotiated: no published rate card, no published minimum, no published contract term, and a rolling reserve that high-risk contracts routinely let the processor raise unilaterally, so read the top-up triggers. What is not here is the gambling-compliance layer: no gambling regulator license, no responsible-gaming API, no platform connectors and no crypto, all of which stay the operator's problem. There is also no Trustpilot, G2 or Capterra footprint at all, so reference calls have to do the work public scores do elsewhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

7 questions about Latpay

Our Verdict: Should You Use Latpay?

Final assessment for iGaming operators

Adequate

Overall iGaming Score

Summary

A 25-year-old high-risk PSP specialist with a real asset (80-90+ gambling-friendly acquiring bank network plus cascading routing) and a real list of structural gaps (no gambling regulator licenses, no platform connectors, no crypto, no responsible-gaming API, no public review surface). The right answer for emerging-market gambling traffic, high-risk merchant acquiring across verticals beyond gambling, and Australian-incorporated operators valuing the AFSL 521901 backbone. The wrong answer for UKGC or MGA-licensed operations consolidating onto a single Tier-1 PSP, for crypto-first platforms, for US-regulated sports betting, and for casinos running SoftSwiss or EveryMatrix that expect pre-built integrations.

Strongest Point

The 80-90+ gambling-friendly acquiring bank network combined with the cascading routing layer is the real product asset. For high-risk gambling card volume where decline rates run materially above mainstream eCommerce, recovering 10-20% of declines through real-time acquirer fallback translates to material revenue. Tier-1 PSPs offer comparable smart routing but at higher minimums, longer onboarding cycles and stricter underwriting that gambling traffic often can't meet. Latpay's structure was built around gambling underwriting from 2001 rather than retrofitted onto eCommerce-first infrastructure, and that history shows up in the acquirer-relationship depth even though it doesn't translate to scale or to the publicly-visible Trustpilot/G2 review surface.

Key Limitation

No gambling-tier regulator licensing, no iGaming platform connectors, no crypto, no responsible-gaming API, no public review footprint, no mobile SDK, and opaque pricing without a public rate card. Each gap individually is workable, but stacked together they put Latpay firmly in the niche-specialist category rather than the consolidation-PSP category. The user-trust dimension is the most operationally relevant gap, since procurement teams expecting Trustpilot or G2 social proof simply won't find it.

Recommendation

Choose Latpay if gambling is the focus, the merchant traffic includes emerging-market or higher-risk segments that mainstream PSPs decline, cascading routing is a real revenue lever, and the operator is comfortable with reference-call validation in lieu of public review scores. Pair with a crypto specialist (CoinsPaid, NOWPayments) if crypto matters and a regional specialist (PayRetailers for LATAM, AstroPay for LATAM e-wallet, Brite for European A2A) if local-method depth matters. Avoid Latpay if running a UKGC or MGA-licensed operation requiring end-to-end gambling-compliance integration, if SoftSwiss or EveryMatrix platform connectors are required, if US-regulated sports betting is the target, or if the buying committee weights public Trustpilot ratings heavily.

Pros

  • 80-90+ gambling-friendly acquiring bank network curated specifically for high-risk underwriting since 2001. This is the real product asset, since when a merchant gets onboarded onto Latpay, the routing layer can fall back through multiple gambling-friendly acquirers in real time. Mainstream PSPs sourcing acquirers for gambling traffic on the fly can't match the depth of these long-tenured relationships.
  • Cascading smart routing reroutes declined transactions to alternate acquirers within the same API request, recovering revenue on high-risk card volume where decline rates run materially above mainstream eCommerce. For a $1M monthly card book, recovering 10-20% of declines translates to $100-200k of additional accepted volume. Tier-1 PSPs offer equivalent functionality but at higher minimums and longer onboarding cycles that exclude smaller high-risk merchants.
  • Australian Financial Services License 521901 issued by ASIC to Lateral Payment Solutions Pty Ltd. PCI DSS Level 1 service provider. BACS-accredited Direct Debit Bureau in the UK for native UK direct-debit processing. The regulatory backbone is meaningfully stronger than offshore-only high-risk processors and specifically useful for Australian-incorporated operators.
  • 17-year iGaming-specific operating history inside a company running since 2001. The team that handles the merchant relationship understands gambling chargebacks, gambling KYC patterns, jurisdictional player-funds questions and the underwriting friction that high-risk merchants hit. For operators where 'a PSP whose team actually understands my business' is the real ask, this is a tangible operational difference compared to a generalist enterprise PSP whose iGaming desk is one of fifteen vertical desks.
  • Hosted Payment Page and Embedded UI Checkout cover both PCI-scope-minimizing paths cleanly, so a merchant can stay out of scope whether it wants a redirect or an inline form. CMS plugins exist for WooCommerce, Magento, OpenCart and Joomla VirtueMart, which compresses integration to days on those stacks.
  • Niche specialist positioning translates to direct account-manager access rather than tier-3 ticket support. A small team means the people writing the merchant agreement are reachable by the people processing the chargebacks. For operators frustrated by enterprise-PSP support tiers (Stripe, PayPal Enterprise, even some Nuvei desks) this is a real operating-model difference.

Cons

  • No gambling-tier regulator licensing. AFSL 521901 is a fintech license under ASIC, and it does not equate to a Malta Gaming Authority license, UK Gambling Commission gambling-tier authorization, Curaçao eGaming license or US state gambling licensing. For UKGC or MGA-licensed operations the gambling-compliance layer (responsible gaming, self-exclusion, deposit limits, jurisdiction reporting) sits entirely on the operator. Nuvei holds the full gambling-license stack, Paysafe holds a similar one, and Latpay holds none of it.
  • No pre-built connectors for SoftSwiss, EveryMatrix, Bragg, Altenar, BetConstruct or Slotegrator. Paysafe at least sits in the SoftSwiss and EveryMatrix catalogs through Skrill, Neteller and paysafecard. For casinos running on those platforms (a meaningful share of the regulated online casino market), choosing Latpay means custom platform-side development that erodes the 1-3 week technical integration advantage and adds maintenance burden.
  • Zero native crypto support. No Bitcoin, no Ethereum, no stablecoins, no on-ramp, no off-ramp. For iGaming operators where crypto deposits run 20-40% of volume at international casinos this is a real gap that requires pairing with CoinsPaid, NOWPayments or BitPay, a second vendor relationship with separate KYB, separate dashboards and separate reconciliation.
  • No responsible-gaming API. No self-exclusion endpoint, no integrated deposit-limit enforcement, no jurisdiction-aware compliance tooling. UKGC and MGA operations require these capabilities, and with Latpay they have to be built operator-side or layered through SoftSwiss/EveryMatrix tooling (which then loops back to the missing-connector problem).
  • No public Trustpilot profile, no G2 listing, no Capterra rating. The B2B PSP review ecosystem is thin in general, but Latpay's footprint is even thinner than the segment norm. For procurement teams that weight third-party social proof, this is a real gap, since reference calls have to fill the role that public review scores fill for Ecommpay, Worldpay or AstroPay.
  • Opaque pricing with no published rate card. Custom tier-based transaction pricing varying by volume and region, where the actual numbers only surface after the application and underwriting process. Combined with the high-risk segment norm of higher headline rates and meaningful rolling-reserve withholding, this is the dimension where procurement teams without high-risk-PSP experience routinely overpay on initial contracts. No public mobile SDK and no public GitHub organization also limit developer-experience signals.

Ready to evaluate Latpay for your business?

Latpay vs. Alternatives: How It Compares

Similar payment processing solutions

Latpay's positioning is niche, so the alternative depends on which gap pushes the decision. For higher-tier regulated gambling, Nuvei is the consolidation answer, since it holds the gambling license stack, the platform connectors, the US state authorizations and the dedicated iGaming compliance team that Latpay doesn't. For UK card acquiring depth with FCA regulation and direct Visa/Mastercard membership, Worldpay fits better. For other high-risk specialists in the same tier as Latpay, CommerceGate (similar gambling-friendly acquiring focus), eMerchantPay (broader high-risk product surface) and Pay4Fun (Brazilian gambling specialist with PIX depth) are the direct comparables. For crypto coverage that Latpay doesn't provide, CoinsPaid is the iGaming-focused option. For LATAM local-method depth, AstroPay or PayRetailers.

When to Choose an Alternative

  • Nuvei

    Choose Nuvei if gambling is the core business and consolidation onto a single PSP matters. 720+ payment methods, an MGA + UKGC + Isle of Man + US state gambling license stack, and a dedicated iGaming compliance team. Higher minimums than Latpay but full-stack iGaming positioning.

  • CommerceGate

    Choose CommerceGate as the closest high-risk specialist comparable. A similar focus on gambling-friendly acquiring through a partner-bank network with cascading routing. Use this for a direct head-to-head pricing comparison during procurement.

  • emerchantpay

    Choose eMerchantPay for a broader high-risk product surface: more APMs, more mobile-first tooling, similar gambling underwriting appetite. A larger team than Latpay with broader European acquiring relationships.

  • CoinsPaid

    Pair CoinsPaid with Latpay if crypto coverage is required. An iGaming-focused crypto processor with a gambling-friendly compliance posture. Use alongside Latpay for the card and APM side.

  • PayRetailers

    Pair PayRetailers with Latpay for LATAM local-method depth that Latpay doesn't deliver. Direct PIX, Boleto and 100+ LATAM local-method coverage with regional acquiring relationships.

Often Paired With

Providers that complement Latpay

  • CommerceGate

    CommerceGate

    High-risk PSP + Payment Facilitator
    5.9
    Deposit Fee
    2-5%
    Settlement
    T+3 - T+7
    Methods
    Not published
    Rating
    2.8/5
  • Pay4Fun

    Pay4Fun

    Brazil iGaming wallet + gateway
    5.5
    Deposit Fee
    1-5%
    Settlement
    T+0 - T+1
    Methods
    4
  • emerchantpay

    emerchantpay

    Full-Stack PSP
    7.5
    Deposit Fee
    Custom (IC++ or blended)
    Settlement
    T+1 - T+3
    Methods
    80+
    Rating
    4.2/5
  • BridgerPay

    BridgerPay

    Payment Orchestrator
    5.9
    Deposit Fee
    0.1-0.5%
    Settlement
    Depends on PSP
    Methods
    1,000+
  • Praxis Tech

    Praxis Tech

    Payment Orchestrator
    5.9
    Deposit Fee
    Custom
    Settlement
    Depends
    Methods
    1,000+
    Rating
    2.4/5

Related Reading

Operator guides and analysis relevant to evaluating Latpay.

End of Report. Latpay Provider Assessment Report 2026

Prepared and reviewed by the iGaming Payment Solutions Editorial Team ·

Last verified: