Skip to content

77 providers

Payper

Payper Review

Is It the Right Payment Solution for Your iGaming Business?

Adequate
Local/Regional PSPVerified
Visit Payper

By the iGaming Payment Solutions Editorial Team ·

Payper runs the same Canadian bank-rail product as Gigadat and Paramount Commerce, taking Interac e-Transfer and online-banking deposits for operators that serve Canadian players. It is the newest and smallest of the three, incorporated in Ontario in 2020 and only FINTRAC-registered in 2023, and it competes on two points where the incumbents are weak: payout speed and weekend processing. Where Gigadat runs Monday to Friday and takes one to three business days to pay a player out, Payper processes seven days a week and ships withdrawals in under 30 minutes once the casino approves them. The rail is also wider than a pure Interac stack, with deposits over Interac e-Transfer, enhanced-EFT online banking and digital cheque, and payouts that add EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send. What it does not do is anything outside Canada: settlement is CAD only, there are no card deposits and there is no crypto. The commercial case is the usual push-payment one, with chargebacks Payper puts at roughly one in 10,000 and no rolling reserve to tie up working capital. Against that, the pitch carries real caveats: Payper publishes no pricing at all, names no operator clients and none can be confirmed elsewhere (Stake.ca is widely reported to alternate Payper and Gigadat by deposit size, but that traces to affiliate write-ups rather than a cashier listing), and at six years old it has nothing approaching Gigadat's decade in the market. The one strong signal under the hood is the commercial team: VP of sales Robert Haggan advised Nuvei on the North American market and then ran iGaming sales at Trustly before joining.

Founded Toronto, Canada~7 Payment MethodsReal‑time Settlement
Canadian iGamingFast WithdrawalsWeekend CashoutsNot a fit: Global Brands
#Interac e-Transfer#7-Day Processing#Sub-30-Min Withdrawals#No Chargebacks#FINTRAC MSB#Canada Only

What operators ask about Payper

Is Payper Inc legit?

Yes: Payper Inc is a Canadian payment processor incorporated in Ontario in 2020 and registered with FINTRAC as a Money Services Business (M23617425, valid to December 2027 on the live registry). The caveats are thinness rather than fraud: no published pricing, no operator client confirmable from public data, and no public PCI attestation.

More in Compliance

What is the Payper Inc charge on my bank statement?

Payper is the processor behind the Interac option at many Canadian gambling cashiers, so a Payper Inc line on a statement is usually a deposit pushed to a casino or sportsbook that routes through it. The gambling site's own name often never appears; check your play accounts first, and note that an authorized Interac push cannot be reversed the way a card charge can.

More in FAQ

How do Payper gambling withdrawals work?

The casino approves the payout, then Payper ships it in under 30 minutes, seven days a week including holidays, over Interac e-Transfer, EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct or Mastercard Send. Default velocity runs about CAD 10,000 a day / CAD 20,000 a week per player before negotiated VIP limits, and the wait a player actually feels depends on how fast the site's own compliance team approves.

More in Speed

Which casinos use Payper?

No operator is confirmed from public data: Payper names no clients, and the lists in affiliate guides (Stake.ca, Betway, PowerPlay and others) are inference rather than cashier evidence. What is verifiable sits at category level: an integration as provider ID 204 in the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway, and trade coverage treating Payper and Gigadat as the two most common Interac processors at Canadian gambling sites.

More in Product

Quick Info

Type
Local/Regional PSP
Founded
2020
HQ
Toronto, Canada
Pricing
Custom
APMs
~7
Settlement
Real-time

Our iGaming Score: 5.9/10

Weighted scoring across five criteria

  • iGaming Fit

    Gaming-first since 2020. VP of sales Robert Haggan came from Trustly iGaming and Nuvei. The vertical now lives off-site: the redesigned payper.ca is gambling-silent, while SBC Summit Canada 2026 booths and the iGB directory carry the posture

    Weight
    30%
    Score
    8.0
    Rating
    Strong
  • Geographic Coverage

    Canada only. Several domestic rails (Interac, enhanced EFT, Visa Direct, Mastercard Send) but no footprint outside the country. Says it plans to expand, hasn't yet

    Weight
    22%
    Score
    2.5
    Rating
    Insufficient
  • Security & Compliance

    FINTRAC-registered MSB (M23617425). Near-zero chargebacks on push payments. ML fraud, negative databases and AML monitoring. No gambling license of its own; supplies AGCO and offshore operators. PCI DSS not publicly confirmed

    Weight
    20%
    Score
    6.0
    Rating
    Adequate
  • Fees & Pricing

    Custom pricing, no rate card. Bills the operator, not the player. Push-only, so no rolling reserve. Described as 'fair rates' but no published percentages; you learn them by signing

    Weight
    16%
    Score
    5.8
    Rating
    Adequate
  • Tech & Integration

    One API for pay-ins and pay-outs, server-to-server with a hosted redirect. Integrated in the PXP/Kalixa gateway (provider 204). Docs sit behind the gateway portal, not payper.ca. 1-2 week integration, no SDK

    Weight
    12%
    Score
    7.0
    Rating
    Strong
  • User Trust

    Almost no review base: one Trustpilot review, nothing on G2/Capterra/Glassdoor. Normal for a back-end processor, since players deal with Interac, not Payper. No verifiable operator references either

    Weight
    context only
    Score
    5.0
    Rating
    Adequate
  • Overall
    Weight
    100%
    Score
    5.9
    Rating
    Adequate

We score each provider on 5 weighted criteria using a 1 to 10 scale. iGaming Fit carries the most weight at 30% because that is what matters most for gambling operators. Geographic Coverage gets 22%. Security & Compliance gets 20%. Fees & Pricing gets 16%. Tech & Integration gets 12%. The final score is a weighted average of those 5. Trustpilot is shown for context but carries no weight, since player reviews of casinos are not a read on B2B acquiring quality.

Score Explanation

iGaming Fit at 8.0 is the standout, Tech follows at 7.0, Fees and Security land mid-scale, and Geographic Coverage is at the floor, which is the unavoidable result of being Canada-only. The iGaming score reflects a company built around gambling rather than one that merely tolerates it: a sales lead who ran the vertical at Trustly and advised Nuvei, explicit high-risk-iGaming marketing, and a presence at SBC Summit Canada, ICE London and the Canadian Gaming Summit. Security sits mid-scale on the FINTRAC MSB registration and the near-zero chargebacks that come with push payments, held down by the absence of any gambling-jurisdiction license to weigh and by the lack of a public PCI DSS confirmation. Geographic Coverage scores low because the product is national by design, not because anything is missing from it. Fees land mid for the same reason Gigadat's do: with no rate card, the lack of a rolling reserve helps the number while the opacity caps it. Tech scores second-highest and would go higher on packaging alone, since the single pay-in/pay-out API is clean and integrates in one to two weeks, but the docs sit inside the PXP/Kalixa portal rather than in the open, there is no SDK, and deposits run through a bank redirect that the rail imposes. User Trust barely registers because there is almost no review history, which is normal for a back-end processor but leaves nothing in the way of public references to check.

Who Is Payper Best For?

The operator profiles that fit, and the ones that do not

Recommended For

  • Canadian iGaming operators where withdrawal speed is the retention lever. Payper pays players out in under 30 minutes once the casino approves the request, seven days a week including weekends and holidays, which is aimed squarely at Gigadat's one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday window. If your VIPs churn when a Friday-night withdrawal sits until Tuesday, this is the rail that fixes it.
  • Brands needing weekend and holiday processing. Canadian gambling traffic peaks at the weekend, just when Gigadat's Monday-to-Friday cycle leaves a Saturday cashout waiting until Monday. Payper runs deposits and payouts straight through weekends and holidays, and that timing gap is the clearest practical difference between the two.
  • Operators wanting a modern A2A rail beyond pure Interac. Deposits cover Interac e-Transfer, enhanced-EFT online banking and digital cheque, and payouts add EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send. Those last two matter for any player who hasn't set up Interac auto-deposit, because you can push the withdrawal straight to their card instead of waiting on a security-question e-Transfer they have to claim.
  • Newer Canadian casinos onboarding their first payment stack. Payper takes on challenger brands and exposes one API for both deposits and payouts, so an operator that can't yet command a custom Nuvei deal can build a workable Canada-first stack from Payper plus a card PSP. Running Gigadat alongside it as a fallback rail is the common pattern, though the Stake.ca version of that story comes from affiliate write-ups rather than any cashier listing.

Not Recommended For

  • Operators outside Canada. The rails are domestic Canadian banking and they stop at the border, so on a European, LATAM or APAC cashier Payper just sits there unused. Trustly and Brite cover European open banking, AstroPay handles LATAM, and Nuvei reaches 50-plus markets through one integration.
  • Crypto-first platforms. There is no Bitcoin, no stablecoin and no on- or off-ramp anywhere in the product. For that you want NOWPayments (350-plus coins), CoinsPaid (20-plus with fiat conversion for regulated EU brands) or BitPay at the enterprise end.
  • Brands needing card or wallet deposits. Every deposit method is account-to-account: no card-in, no PayPal, no Skrill or Neteller, no Apple Pay or Google Pay, and the Visa Direct and Mastercard Send rails run outbound only. Taking a Visa deposit means putting Nuvei or Worldpay alongside it.
  • Operators who require a long, audited track record. Payper incorporated in 2020 and registered as an MSB only in 2023, against Gigadat's run as the default Interac processor since the mid-2010s. It is growing but nowhere near as widely deployed, and no operator client can be confirmed from public data; the names that circulate in affiliate guides (Stake.ca, Betway, JackpotCity) are inference rather than cashier listings. If your due diligence needs named, checkable references, Payper can't supply them yet.

Geographic Coverage

Per-market verdict, regions, and market focus

One provider, two answers. The verdict flips depending on who is asking, and that is the point. The overall score rates the company. This rates the fit for your market.

Offshore operator

Curaçao / Anjouan license, serving grey and restricted markets.

Solid62best, in CA
CA sportsbookSolid62
CA casinoSolid62

Licensed operator

Holds the local license in a regulated market.

Solid65best, in CA
CA sportsbookSolid65
CA casinoSolid65

Market-by-market verdict

For an offshore operator: Solid as a sportsbook processor in Canada, and across the markets below.

2 Solid
MarketCasinoSportsbook
CA Canada
Solid62

Trade-known

Solid62

Trade-known

The tier is the verdict. The small number orders providers inside a tier; it is not a provider-level score. The grey line under each verdict is the evidence grade: Verified means named clients we can point to, Register-verified means the entry stands in a regulator's own register, Trade-known means known in the trade, Provider-claimed means the provider's word, discounted in the math. Full method on our methodology page.

RegionsNorth America

Coverage Analysis

Canada and nothing else. The country count is one, and as with Gigadat that is what the product is rather than a hole in it. Everything runs on domestic rails (Interac, enhanced-EFT online banking, digital cheque, and Visa Direct or Mastercard Send pushes within Canada), and settlement is CAD only. Payper has said it wants to expand internationally, but through 2026 there is no live coverage beyond Canada, so an operator who also needs Europe or LATAM should plan to run it as one rail under a global PSP rather than wait.

Regional Breakdown

Inside Canada the reach is broad, since the bank-redirect flow works with any Canadian account and the enhanced-EFT path extends past the basic Interac e-Transfer base. Payper does not publish a connected-bank count the way Gigadat (250+) or Loonio (300+) do, so there is no way to benchmark its depth against them on public data. Ontario is the biggest market because of iGaming Ontario regulation, and Payper sells into that regulated base as well as to offshore brands serving Canadian players.

Gambling Licenses Served

  • AGCO / iGaming Ontario operators (supplier, de facto)
  • Offshore-licensed brands serving Canadian players

Key Features for iGaming Operators

Products, payment methods, and verticals

Key Products

  • Interac e-Transfer Pay-Ins
  • Online Banking (enhanced EFT) deposits
  • Digital Cheque (EFT)
  • Interac e-Transfer Payouts
  • EFT Direct Deposit
  • Visa Direct
  • Mastercard Send

The product is one API working in two directions. On the pay-in side it takes deposits over Interac e-Transfer, enhanced-EFT online banking and digital cheque, with the player redirecting into their bank, authorizing, and pushing the money to the operator. On the pay-out side it sends withdrawals over Interac e-Transfer, EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send, the last two landing straight on the player's card. Processing is real-time and runs seven days a week, holidays included, with a fraud layer (machine-learning checks, negative databases, AML monitoring) and automated reconciliation across both flows. For an operator integrating now, that comes down to one set of credentials exposing the full deposit and withdrawal menu through a single server-to-server API.

Payment Methods

This is a multi-rail Canadian A2A stack, not a single Interac flow. Deposits come in over Interac e-Transfer, enhanced-EFT online banking and digital cheque; payouts go out over Interac e-Transfer, EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send. The payout side is what separates Payper from Gigadat, because pushing a withdrawal to a player's Visa or Mastercard avoids the auto-deposit setup and security-question step that slow ordinary Interac e-Transfer payouts. All of it sits behind one API and one set of credentials. It carries the same limit as any domestic specialist: a player who wants a Canadian bank rail is covered, and a player who wants a card deposit, a wallet, Apple Pay, Google Pay or crypto gets nothing.

Verticals

iGaming has been the lead vertical from the start, though since the ~Nov 2025 redesign payper.ca itself is gambling-silent (zero mentions across all seven pages, checked Jul 2026). The posture lives off-site: a live iGaming Business directory listing as a Canadian payments supplier, confirmed SBC Summit Canada 2026 booths, and a gaming-specific sales operation under Robert Haggan, previously a North American iGaming advisor at Nuvei and then director of iGaming sales at Trustly. It also serves eSports, eCommerce, financial services and digital goods, but the deal flow and the trade-show calendar (SBC Summit Canada, ICE London, the Canadian Gaming Summit) are gambling-first. In practice that buys an operator account contacts who understand casino problems (peak-hour deposit failures, VIP cashout escalations, AGCO reporting) instead of a generic eCommerce queue, and the 24/7/365 support matters more here than anywhere else because gambling traffic ignores business hours.

  • iGaming
  • eSports
  • eCommerce
  • Financial Services
  • Digital Goods
Methods
~7
Crypto
None
Currencies
CAD
iGaming integrations
1
  • Deposit ProcessingAvailable

    ~7 payment methods, Instant (incl. weekends/holidays)

  • Withdrawal / PayoutAvailable

    Near-instant (~30 min, incl. weekends)

  • Instant WithdrawalsAvailable

    Near-instant (~30 min, incl. weekends)

  • KYC / AML Built-inAvailable

    Full auto

  • Chargeback ProtectionAvailable

    Near-zero (push payment)

  • Multi-CurrencyNot available

    CAD

  • API IntegrationAvailable

    Single API (server-to-server) + hosted redirect

  • Local Payment MethodsAvailable

    Local rails in 1 market

  • iGaming SpecializationAvailable

    7-day-a-week real-time processing including weekends; sub-30-minute withdrawals once approved; single API for pay-ins and pay-outs; multiple Canadian rails (Interac, enhanced EFT, Visa Direct, Mastercard Send); near-zero chargebacks; FINTRAC-registered MSB

  • Geographic CoverageAvailable

    1 country across North America

Pricing & Fee Structure

Fee structure and pricing model

Rate Card

Custom
Deposit Fee

Custom (not published)

Withdrawal Fee

Custom

Settlement

Real‑time (push)

Methods

~7

Setup / Monthly

Not published

Integration Fee

Not published

Revenue Share

No

Pricing Details

Payper publishes no rate card; every deal is negotiated and no deposit or withdrawal percentage appears anywhere public. The structure is at least clear: Payper bills the operator for integration and processing, and the player normally pays nothing. Trade and affiliate coverage calls the rates 'fair' and set so operators don't have to surcharge, and puts Payper in the same band as the other Canadian Interac processors, but those are descriptions, not figures. The pricing advantage is the one every push-payment rail has: deposits are authorized inside the player's own bank and chargebacks run near zero (Payper cites about one in 10,000), so there is no case for a rolling reserve, and the working capital a card PSP like Nuvei or Worldpay would lock up at 5-10% for six months stays free. FX doesn't enter into it, since settlement is CAD only. The practical problem for budgeting is that there is no published rate to benchmark against, so you negotiate blind until you have a quote.

Speed & Settlement

Transaction processing and settlement timelines

Deposit

Instant (incl. weekends/holidays)

Player-initiated
Withdrawal

Near‑instant (~30 min, incl. weekends)

Operator payout
Settlement

Real‑time (push)

To operator account
Currencies

CAD only

Settlement options
Refunds

Push payment; once sent, funds are irreversible; failed/expired transactions auto‑return per the e‑Transfer rules (deposit requests expire after 24h, withdrawals after a 30-day window)

Processing time

Speed is what Payper sells. Deposits are instant: the player picks Interac at the cashier, redirects into online banking, authorizes the push, and the credit shows on the operator's side within seconds. Withdrawals are where it pulls ahead, paying out in under 30 minutes once the casino approves and running seven days a week, holidays included, against Gigadat's one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday window, so a Friday-night cashout that would sit until Tuesday on Gigadat clears in minutes here. Settlement on the push payments is effectively real-time. The catch is the 'once the casino approves' wording: the under-30-minute clock starts only after compliance greenlights the payout, so a slow internal review stretches the player's real wait no matter how fast the rail is. Among the field, Loonio runs at a similar pace with its automated Request Money flow and Paybilt clears VIP cashouts same-day on real-time ACH, while Gigadat is the slow option; among non-Interac rails Brite settles T+0 and Trustly T+1, though neither works the Canadian market the way these Interac processors do.

Integration & Tech

Developer experience and technical capabilities

API Type
Single API (server-to-server) + hosted redirect
Onboarding
2-4 weeks
Sandbox
Test environment available through the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway integration (provider testing documentation describes deposit amount thresholds for triggering success/error states). Direct-integration sandbox is provisioned by Payper after the merchant agreement and KYB.
Mobile SDK
No
White-Label
Merchant branding in customer communications is a stated feature; the payment experience and notifications can carry the operator's brand. The actual bank-selection step is still a hosted redirect (Interac/banking restriction), so this is brandable hosted checkout rather than a fully embedded white-label cashier.
Docs Quality
Limited

Integration Time

1-2 weeks

Pre-Built iGaming Integrations

  • Rebilly
View API Documentation

Integration Assessment

One REST API covers deposits and payouts, server-to-server, with a hosted redirect on the deposit leg. The clearest public reference is the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway, where Payper is provider ID 204: deposits go through a Backend2Backend initiatePaymentRequest that returns a redirect to Payper's bank-selection page (method 343), withdrawals are Backend2Backend with no redirect (method 435), and status updates arrive over PaymentStateChangedNotification webhooks. Those docs note a per-deposit ceiling near CAD 3,000, a cap of three concurrent deposits per customer, and a 24-hour expiry on unfinished ones. Payper's own public documentation is thin, though: the real integration guides sit inside the PXP/Kalixa portal rather than on payper.ca, so an operator not coming through that gateway works from an account manager instead of open docs. There is no mobile SDK and no native SoftSwiss or EveryMatrix connector, so those platforms reach Payper through an orchestrator such as BridgerPay or Corefy or through custom work. A competent team integrates in one to two weeks.

Risk & Compliance

Licensing, fraud prevention, and regulatory compliance

Supported Gambling Licenses

  • AGCO / iGaming Ontario operators (supplier, de facto)
  • Offshore-licensed brands serving Canadian players
KYC/AML Automation
Available. Full auto
Chargeback Protection
Available. Near-zero (push payment)
Licenses
FINTRAC MSB (M23617425, Registered; valid to 2027-12-11 per the live FINTRAC registry)
Fraud Prevention
Machine-learning fraud checks + negative databases + layered risk tools + AML monitoring
Responsible Gaming
No
Tokenization
Player banking credentials are entered inside their own bank, never reaching the merchant. Payper's risk layer handles the transaction reference rather than exposing raw account data to the operator.
Dispute Resolution
Merchant support via account team; no consumer chargeback path (push payment)

Compliance Context

Payper is a FINTRAC-registered Money Services Business (registration M23617425, March 2023) covering money transferring and payment-service-provider activity, on an Ontario incorporation from May 2020, which carries the full PCMLTFA load of KYC, AML transaction monitoring and record-keeping. Fraud control runs on machine-learning risk scoring, negative databases and layered checks before funds leave an account, on top of encryption and continuous monitoring. Because the rail only pushes, the exposure is identity, account takeover and money-mule activity rather than card-not-present fraud, and the toolset is shaped to that. KYC rests on the player authenticating inside their own online banking, with the bank's identity record as the anchor; no third-party KYC vendor such as Onfido or Sumsub is named in public sources. Two things are missing. PCI DSS is plausible given the Visa Direct and Mastercard Send card-push, but nothing public confirms it, so it isn't claimed here; and Payper holds no gambling license of its own, operating instead as a supplier to iGaming-Ontario-registered operators and to offshore Kahnawake or Curacao brands serving Canadian players.

Regulatory Position

The regulatory base is the FINTRAC MSB registration: M23617425, dated March 27, 2023, for money transferring and payment-service-provider activity, on a May 2020 Ontario incorporation. That carries the full PCMLTFA load of KYC, AML transaction monitoring and reporting, and record-keeping. Payper holds no gambling license itself and works as a supplier to iGaming-Ontario-registered operators and to offshore brands serving Canadian players. PCI DSS is plausible given the card-push payouts but isn't confirmed anywhere public, so it isn't asserted here; an operator running formal vendor due diligence should ask Payper for the PCI attestation and FINTRAC paperwork directly rather than take it on public claims.

About Payper: Company Background

Company and product information

Company Name
Payper
Headquarters
Toronto, Canada
Founded
2020
Employees
11-50 (LinkedIn band; ~5 profiles listed)
Company Type
Private
Product Type
Local/Regional PSP
Licenses
FINTRAC MSB (M23617425, Registered; valid to 2027-12-11 per the live FINTRAC registry)
Key Products
Interac e-Transfer Pay-Ins, Online Banking (enhanced EFT) deposits, Digital Cheque (EFT), Interac e-Transfer Payouts, EFT Direct Deposit, Visa Direct, Mastercard Send
Website
payper.ca
Supported Verticals
iGaming, eSports, eCommerce, Financial Services, Digital Goods
Integration Type
Single API (server-to-server) + hosted redirect
Settlement Speed
Real-time (push)
Onboarding Speed
2-4 weeks
Named iGaming Clients
Not published

Company History

Payper Inc was incorporated in Ontario on May 15, 2020 (corporation #002756079), with a registered address at 1 Hunter Street East, Suite 100, Hamilton, Ontario, which is a virtual office; the operating base is Toronto. The premise was the one that had built Gigadat a decade earlier: Canadians pay online through Interac and bank transfer, wiring up every bank directly is painful, and merchants (iGaming operators serving Canadian players above all) want one fast integration point instead. Payper's wrinkle was to run it faster and seven days a week.

It registered as a FINTRAC Money Services Business on March 27, 2023 (M23617425, covering money transferring and payment-service-provider activity), the licensing any Canadian MSB needs. Around then it built out a gaming-specific commercial team, hiring Robert Haggan as VP of sales in 2022. Haggan had advised Nuvei on the North American market and then run iGaming sales at Trustly, the background a Canadian gaming-payments specialist wants.

Through 2024 to 2026 Payper pushed hard on visibility, positioning itself against Gigadat and Paramount Commerce on the Interac rail. It exhibited at ICE London 2024, the Canadian Gaming Summit in 2023 and 2024 (where Haggan spoke on payments and compliance), and SBC Summit Canada 2026, on a floor that also held Gigadat, Paramount Commerce and iGaming Ontario. It was integrated as a server-to-server Interac method (provider ID 204) inside the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway, which put it in reach of any operator already on that gateway. By 2026 trade coverage treats Payper and Gigadat as the two most common Interac processors at Canadian gambling sites, with operators such as Stake.ca reportedly running both and routing between them by deposit size and load. Payper is the newer and faster of the two, while Gigadat has the longer track record and the wider bank reach.

What Users Say About Payper

What the review record shows, and what it does not

Trustpilot Presence

Payper has no usable review history: one Trustpilot review and nothing meaningful on G2, Capterra or Glassdoor. For a back-end processor that's expected rather than damning, but it does mean there are no verifiable operator references to fall back on either. Vet it through reference calls with existing Canadian iGaming clients, through the PXP / Kalixa gateway team that sees its performance across merchants, and by asking for the FINTRAC and PCI documentation directly rather than trusting a review score.

Client Evidence

Not one operator client is confirmed. Payper publishes no names, and the casinos that turn up in affiliate guides (Stake.ca, Betway, JackpotCity, PowerPlay, PlayOJO, TonyBet, Royal Vegas) are inference rather than cashier-level evidence. Stake.ca is the most-cited and is said to alternate between Payper and Gigadat by deposit amount, timing and load, but no source offers a screenshot or direct cashier observation, and players usually can't tell which processor handled a given transaction anyway. The count stays at zero rather than get padded with names that trace back to affiliate pages. The category-level evidence is firmer: Payper is integrated as provider ID 204 in the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway, listed as a payments supplier in the iGaming Business directory, and named across trade coverage as one of the two dominant Interac processors for Canadian iGaming. That is enough to confirm a real, in-production B2B processor, just not enough to name its operators.

Operational Details

Business terms, contracts, and support

Dedicated Account Manager
Yes; iGaming sales/account team
Minimum Monthly Volume
Not published. Target is licensed/established Canadian merchants; primarily iGaming operators (AGCO/iGaming Ontario registered or offshore brands serving Canadian players) and eCommerce.
Contract Lock-In
Not published
Migration Support
Yes
Min/Max Transaction
CAD ~30 - CAD 3,000 per deposit (gateway docs error out above ~CAD 2,899‑3,000); withdrawal velocity reported at CAD 10,000/day and CAD 20,000/week, with higher VIP limits negotiated
Mass Payouts
Real‑time + batch · Reported CAD 10,000/day and CAD 20,000/week withdrawal velocity per player by default; higher VIP limits negotiated
Biometric / One-Click
No
Reporting
Automated reconciliation + webhook state notifications

Canadian Interac e-Transfer / A2A processor for iGaming; direct Gigadat/Paramount competitor (Stake.ca reportedly load-balances Interac across Payper + Gigadat). Operating HQ Toronto; registered FINTRAC address is a Hamilton virtual office. Founder/owner not public (VP Sales Robert Haggan, ex-Trustly/Nuvei). Payper rebuilt payper.ca around November 2025, stripping out every gambling reference in favour of generic enterprise positioning and launching the ClickTap checkout product; the /play/ section is a promo browser game rather than an iGaming page.

Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions about Payper

Our Verdict: Should You Use Payper?

Final assessment for iGaming operators

Adequate

Overall iGaming Score

Summary

Payper handles the same job as Gigadat, taking push-payment bank deposits and paying players out for Canadian iGaming, but it beats Gigadat on the parts players notice: withdrawals in under 30 minutes and processing that runs through weekends. It is FINTRAC-registered, built around gambling, led on sales by an ex-Trustly and Nuvei operator, and carries a wider payout menu than Gigadat with Visa Direct and Mastercard Send. The catches are real: Canada and CAD only, no published pricing, no public confirmation of PCI DSS, a short track record (incorporated 2020, MSB in 2023), and no operator client confirmable from public data. It is the right tool for the fast-cashout, Canadian slice of a stack rather than a base to build the whole thing on.

Strongest Point

Withdrawal speed and weekend processing on a near-zero-chargeback rail. Paying out in under 30 minutes, seven days a week, is a concrete advantage over Gigadat's one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday window, and in 2026 cashout speed is one of the main VIP retention levers in Canadian iGaming. Add the push-payment chargeback profile (about one in 10,000, no rolling reserve) and the wider payout options through Visa Direct and Mastercard Send, and you have a rail aimed at operators who compete on how fast players get paid.

Key Limitation

Maturity and transparency, in that order. A 2020 company with a 2023 registration is competing against a decade-old incumbent, with no operator client confirmable from public data and only affiliate inference to go on. Pricing is undocumented, so every operator negotiates blind, and PCI DSS stays unconfirmed despite the card-push payouts. Like Gigadat it is also single-country and single-currency, so it can't be a full stack on its own: Europe still needs Trustly or Brite, LATAM needs AstroPay, and global cards need Nuvei.

Recommendation

Use Payper for the fast-withdrawal, Canada-facing part of an operation, especially where cashout speed and weekend processing are how you compete for and keep players. Pair it with Gigadat as a deeper backup rail (running both, the way Stake.ca reportedly does, is a sound model) and with a card or crypto PSP for everything Payper doesn't touch. Since the track record is short and the pricing opaque, do the diligence the public data won't do for you: ask for the FINTRAC and PCI paperwork, get reference calls with existing clients, and benchmark the quote against Gigadat and Loonio before signing.

Pros

  • Pays players out in under 30 minutes once the casino approves, seven days a week including weekends and holidays. It is the clearest advantage over Gigadat's one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday window, and cashout speed is a primary VIP retention lever in Canadian iGaming in 2026.
  • A wider payout menu than plain Interac. Payouts run over Interac e-Transfer, EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send, and the card-push options get around the auto-deposit setup and security-question step that slow Interac e-Transfer withdrawals for players whose bank setup isn't ideal.
  • Near-zero chargeback exposure and no rolling reserve. The rails are push payments authorized inside the player's own bank, and Payper puts its chargeback rate at roughly one in 10,000, which frees up the working capital a card PSP would otherwise lock at 5-10% for six months.
  • A real gambling focus and the leadership to match, even as the owned site went gambling-silent in the Nov 2025 redesign. Payper keeps a live iGaming Business directory listing, confirmed SBC Summit Canada 2026 booths, and sales under Robert Haggan, who advised Nuvei on the North American market and then ran iGaming sales at Trustly. The stated 24/7/365 support matters for traffic that ignores business hours.
  • FINTRAC-registered MSB with a machine-learning fraud stack. Registration M23617425 carries full PCMLTFA AML obligations, on top of ML risk scoring, negative databases and layered checks that run before funds leave an account.
  • One API for both pay-ins and pay-outs, already integrated in the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway as provider 204. Operators on that gateway reach Payper without a custom build, and a direct integration runs one to two weeks.

Cons

  • Single-country, single-currency. Canada and CAD only, on domestic banking rails that stop at the border. Any operator with European, LATAM or APAC traffic needs a full second PSP stack, and Payper becomes one small rail rather than a foundation.
  • Pricing is opaque. There is no public rate card and no published percentages; the merchant-pays-not-player structure and 'fair rates' framing are documented, but the numbers are negotiated blind, so you compare nothing until you have signed.
  • No operator client confirmable from public data. Payper doesn't publish names, and the casinos cited in affiliate guides (Stake.ca, Betway, JackpotCity) are inference rather than cashier listings, so there are no named, checkable references for due diligence.
  • Short track record. Incorporated in 2020 and FINTRAC-registered only in 2023, against Gigadat's run as the default Interac processor since the mid-2010s. Adoption is growing but not yet as wide, and there is less operational history to judge stability against.
  • No card or wallet deposits, no crypto, nothing outside the Canadian bank rails. The deposit side is all account-to-account, and Visa Direct and Mastercard Send are payout-only. Card acquiring still needs Nuvei; crypto needs CoinsPaid or NOWPayments.
  • Thin, gated developer documentation. The real integration guides sit inside the PXP/Kalixa portal rather than anywhere Payper publishes, there is no open GitHub or SDK, and no native SoftSwiss or EveryMatrix connector, so platforms reach it through an orchestrator or custom work. Payper's PCI DSS status is also unconfirmed.

Ready to evaluate Payper for your business?

Payper vs. Alternatives: How It Compares

Similar payment processing solutions

Payper is rarely an either/or choice, since it's one rail in one market; the real question is which Canadian Interac processor to run, or which combination, and what to pair it with for everything outside Canada. Gigadat is the incumbent for maximum Canadian reach and a decade of history, and plenty of operators run Gigadat for depth and Payper for fast weekend cashouts, the way Stake.ca reportedly does. Where Canada is only one market in a global operation, Nuvei folds Interac into a 720-plus-method, 50-plus-country integration that also covers cards, wallets and Apple/Google Pay. Most mature operators land on a Canadian Interac rail (Payper or Gigadat, often both), a global PSP for cards and a separate crypto gateway.

When to Choose an Alternative

  • Gigadat

    Choose Gigadat, or run it alongside Payper, if you want the deepest and most-proven Canadian Interac coverage. Gigadat has been the default processor since the mid-2010s, names 250-plus connected banks with Big 6 coverage, and has a decade-long track record Payper can't match yet. The trade-off is speed: its one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday withdrawals are what Payper beats, so the usual pattern is Gigadat for reach and Payper for fast cashouts.

  • Nuvei

    Choose Nuvei if Canada is part of a larger global operation. Nuvei carries Interac e-Transfer alongside 720-plus methods across 50-plus markets and bundles cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay and wallets into one API, so you avoid running a Canada-only vendor separately. The trade-off is a rolling reserve on card volume and a higher overall fee mix, plus the loss of Payper's weekend-speed edge on the Interac leg.

Alternatives

Providers operators shortlist alongside Payper

  • Gigadat

    Gigadat

    Local/Regional PSP
    iGaming score 5.7 out of 10
    Deposit Fee
    Custom (not published)
    Settlement
    T+1 - T+3
    Methods
    3
    Trustpilot
    2.4/5
  • Paramount Commerce

    Paramount Commerce

    Open Banking PSP
    iGaming score 5.2 out of 10
    Deposit Fee
    Custom (not published)
    Settlement
    T+1 - T+3
    Methods
    3

Related Reading

Operator guides and analysis relevant to evaluating Payper.

End of Report. Payper Provider Assessment Report 2026

Prepared and reviewed by the iGaming Payment Solutions Editorial Team ·

Last verified: