Payper Review
Is It the Right Payment Solution for Your iGaming Business?
Adequate
Payper runs the same Canadian bank-rail product as Gigadat and Paramount Commerce, taking Interac e-Transfer and online-banking deposits for operators that serve Canadian players. It is the newest and smallest of the three, incorporated in Ontario in 2020 and only FINTRAC-registered in 2023, and it competes on two points where the incumbents are weak: payout speed and weekend processing. Where Gigadat runs Monday to Friday and takes one to three business days to pay a player out, Payper processes seven days a week and ships withdrawals in under 30 minutes once the casino approves them. The rail is also wider than a pure Interac stack, with deposits over Interac e-Transfer, Interac Online, enhanced-EFT online banking and digital cheque, and payouts that add EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send. What it does not do is anything outside Canada: settlement is CAD only, there are no card deposits and there is no crypto. The commercial case is the usual push-payment one, with chargebacks Payper puts at roughly one in 10,000 and no rolling reserve to tie up working capital. Against that, the pitch carries real caveats: Payper publishes no pricing at all, no operator client can be confirmed from public sources (Stake.ca is widely reported to alternate Payper and Gigadat by deposit size, but that traces to affiliate write-ups rather than a cashier listing), and at six years old it has nothing approaching Gigadat's decade in the market. The one strong signal under the hood is the commercial team: VP of sales Robert Haggan ran iGaming sales at Trustly and advised Nuvei on the North American market before joining.
Quick Info
- Type
- Local/Regional PSP
- Founded
- 2020
- HQ
- Toronto, Canada
- Pricing
- Custom
- APMs
- ~8
- Settlement
- Real-time (push)
iGaming Score
- iGaming Fit
- 10.0
- Geographic Coverage
- 2.5
- Security & Compliance
- 5.0
- Fees & Pricing
- 5.8
- Tech & Integration
- 7.0
- User Trust
- 5.0
Our iGaming Score: 6.3/10
Weighted scoring across five criteria
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| iGaming Fit Gaming-first since 2020. VP of sales Robert Haggan came from Trustly iGaming and Nuvei. Marketed for the high-risk iGaming vertical; exhibits at SBC Summit Canada and ICE | 30% | 10.0 | Best-in-class |
| Geographic Coverage Canada only. Several domestic rails (Interac, enhanced EFT, Visa Direct, Mastercard Send) but no footprint outside the country. Says it plans to expand, hasn't yet | 22% | 2.5 | Insufficient |
| Security & Compliance FINTRAC-registered MSB (M23617425). Near-zero chargebacks on push payments. ML fraud, negative databases and AML monitoring. No gambling license of its own; supplies AGCO and offshore operators. PCI DSS not publicly confirmed | 20% | 5.0 | Adequate |
| Fees & Pricing Custom pricing, no rate card. Bills the operator, not the player. Push-only, so no rolling reserve. Described as 'fair rates' but no published percentages; you learn them by signing | 16% | 5.8 | Adequate |
| Tech & Integration One API for pay-ins and pay-outs, server-to-server with a hosted redirect. Integrated in the PXP/Kalixa gateway (provider 204). Docs sit behind the gateway portal, not payper.ca. 1-2 week integration, no SDK | 12% | 7.0 | Strong |
| User Trust Almost no review base: one Trustpilot review, nothing on G2/Capterra/Glassdoor. Normal for a back-end processor, since players deal with Interac, not Payper. No verifiable operator references either | 0% | 5.0 | Adequate |
| Overall | 100% | 6.3 | Adequate |
We score each provider on 5 weighted criteria using a 1 to 10 scale. iGaming Fit carries the most weight at 30% because that is what matters most for gambling operators. Geographic Coverage gets 22%. Security & Compliance gets 20%. Fees & Pricing gets 16%. Tech & Integration gets 12%. The final score is a weighted average of those 5. Trustpilot is shown for context but carries no weight, since player reviews of casinos are not a read on B2B acquiring quality.
Score Explanation
Payper scores well on iGaming Fit and Security, in the middle on Fees and Tech, and low on Geographic Coverage, which is the unavoidable result of being Canada-only. The iGaming score reflects a company built around gambling rather than one that merely tolerates it: a sales lead who ran the vertical at Trustly and advised Nuvei, explicit high-risk-iGaming marketing, and a presence at SBC Summit Canada, ICE London and the Canadian Gaming Summit. Security rests on the FINTRAC MSB registration and the near-zero chargebacks that come with push payments, discounted a little because no public source confirms PCI DSS. Geographic Coverage scores low because the product is national by design, not because anything is missing from it. Fees land mid for the same reason Gigadat's do: with no rate card, the lack of a rolling reserve helps the number while the opacity caps it. Tech is held back less by the product than by its packaging, since the single pay-in/pay-out API is clean and integrates in one to two weeks, but the docs sit inside the PXP/Kalixa portal rather than in the open, there is no SDK, and deposits run through a bank redirect that the rail imposes. User Trust barely registers because there is almost no review history, which is normal for a back-end processor but leaves nothing in the way of public references to check.
Who Is Payper Best For?
Weighted scoring across five criteria
Recommended For
- Canadian iGaming operators where withdrawal speed is the retention lever. Operators for whom cashout speed is a retention and acquisition lever. Payper pays players out in under 30 minutes once the casino approves the request, seven days a week including weekends and holidays, which is aimed squarely at Gigadat's one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday window. If your VIPs churn when a Friday-night withdrawal sits until Tuesday, this is the rail that fixes it.
- Brands needing weekend and holiday processing. Operators that need weekend and holiday processing. Canadian gambling traffic peaks at the weekend, just when Gigadat's Monday-to-Friday cycle leaves a Saturday cashout waiting until Monday. Payper runs deposits and payouts straight through weekends and holidays, and that timing gap is the clearest practical difference between the two.
- Operators wanting a modern A2A rail beyond pure Interac. Operators that want more than plain Interac. Deposits cover Interac e-Transfer, Interac Online, enhanced-EFT online banking and digital cheque, and payouts add EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send. Those last two matter for any player who hasn't set up Interac auto-deposit, because you can push the withdrawal straight to their card instead of waiting on a security-question e-Transfer they have to claim.
- Newer Canadian casinos onboarding their first payment stack. Newer or mid-market Canadian casinos standing up their first cashier. Payper takes on challenger brands and exposes one API for both deposits and payouts, so an operator that can't yet command a custom Nuvei deal can build a workable Canada-first stack from Payper plus a card PSP. Running Gigadat alongside it as a fallback rail is common, and reportedly how Stake.ca handles Interac.
Not Recommended For
- Operators outside Canada. Anything not pointed at Canada. The rails are domestic Canadian banking and they stop at the border, so on a European, LATAM or APAC cashier Payper just sits there unused. Trustly and Brite cover European open banking, AstroPay handles LATAM, and Nuvei reaches 50-plus markets through one integration.
- Crypto-first platforms. Crypto-first operators. There is no Bitcoin, no stablecoin and no on- or off-ramp anywhere in the product. For that you want NOWPayments (350-plus coins), CoinsPaid (20-plus with fiat conversion for regulated EU brands) or BitPay at the enterprise end.
- Brands needing card or wallet deposits. Operators that need card or wallet deposits rather than only bank rails. Every deposit method is account-to-account: no card-in, no PayPal, no Skrill or Neteller, no Apple Pay or Google Pay, and the Visa Direct and Mastercard Send rails run outbound only. Taking a Visa deposit means putting Nuvei or Worldpay alongside it.
- Operators who require a long, audited track record. Operators that won't route volume without a long, audited track record. Payper incorporated in 2020 and registered as an MSB only in 2023, against Gigadat's run as the default Interac processor since the mid-2010s. It is growing but nowhere near as widely deployed, and no operator client can be confirmed from public data; the names that circulate in affiliate guides (Stake.ca, Betway, JackpotCity) are inference rather than cashier listings. If your due diligence needs named, checkable references, Payper can't supply them yet.
Geographic Coverage
Per-market verdict, regions, and market focus
One provider, two answers. The verdict flips depending on who is asking, and that is the point. The overall score rates the company. This rates the fit for your market.
Offshore operator
Curaçao / Anjouan licence, serving grey and restricted markets.
Licensed operator
Holds the local licence in a regulated market.
Market-by-market verdict
For an offshore operator: Solid as a sportsbook processor in Canada, and across the markets below.
| Market | Casino | Sportsbook |
|---|---|---|
| CA Canada | Solid63 | Solid63 |
The tier is the verdict. The small number orders providers inside a tier; it is not a provider-level score. Full method on our methodology page.
Regions
- North America
Coverage Analysis
Canada and nothing else. The country count is one, and as with Gigadat that is what the product is rather than a hole in it. Everything runs on domestic rails (Interac, enhanced-EFT online banking, digital cheque, and Visa Direct or Mastercard Send pushes within Canada), and settlement is CAD only. Payper has said it wants to expand internationally, but through 2026 there is no live coverage beyond Canada, so an operator who also needs Europe or LATAM should plan to run it as one rail under a global PSP rather than wait.
Regional Breakdown
Inside Canada the reach is broad, since the bank-redirect flow works with any Canadian account and the enhanced-EFT path extends past the basic Interac e-Transfer base. Payper does not publish a connected-bank count the way Gigadat (250+) or Loonio (300+) do, so there is no way to benchmark its depth against them on public data. Ontario is the biggest market because of iGaming Ontario regulation, and Payper sells into that regulated base as well as to offshore brands serving Canadian players. Updated Q2 2026.
Licensed Jurisdictions
- AGCO/iGaming Ontario supplier (de facto)
- offshore-friendly
Key Features for iGaming Operators
Products, payment methods, and verticals
Key Products
Interac e-Transfer Pay-Ins, Interac Online, Online Banking (enhanced EFT) deposits, Digital Cheque (EFT), Interac e-Transfer Payouts, EFT Direct Deposit, Visa Direct, Mastercard Send
The product is one API working in two directions. On the pay-in side it takes deposits over Interac e-Transfer, Interac Online, enhanced-EFT online banking and digital cheque, with the player redirecting into their bank, authorizing, and pushing the money to the operator. On the pay-out side it sends withdrawals over Interac e-Transfer, EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send, the last two landing straight on the player's card. Processing is real-time and runs seven days a week, holidays included, with a fraud layer (machine-learning checks, negative databases, AML monitoring) and automated reconciliation across both flows. For an operator integrating now, that comes down to one set of credentials exposing the full deposit and withdrawal menu through a single server-to-server API.
Payment Methods
This is a multi-rail Canadian A2A stack, not a single Interac flow. Deposits come in over Interac e-Transfer, Interac Online, enhanced-EFT online banking and digital cheque; payouts go out over Interac e-Transfer, EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send. The payout side is what separates Payper from Gigadat, because pushing a withdrawal to a player's Visa or Mastercard avoids the auto-deposit setup and security-question step that slow ordinary Interac e-Transfer payouts. All of it sits behind one API and one set of credentials. It carries the same limit as any domestic specialist: a player who wants a Canadian bank rail is covered, and a player who wants a card deposit, a wallet, Apple Pay, Google Pay or crypto gets nothing.
Verticals
iGaming has been the lead vertical from the start. Payper markets itself as built for high-risk gambling, lists in the iGaming Business directory as a Canadian payments supplier, and runs a gaming-specific sales operation under Robert Haggan, previously director of iGaming sales at Trustly and a North American iGaming advisor at Nuvei. It also serves eSports, eCommerce, financial services and digital goods, but the deal flow and the trade-show calendar (SBC Summit Canada, ICE London, the Canadian Gaming Summit) are gambling-first. In practice that buys an operator account contacts who understand casino problems (peak-hour deposit failures, VIP cashout escalations, AGCO reporting) instead of a generic eCommerce queue, and the 24/7/365 support matters more here than anywhere else because gambling traffic ignores business hours.
- iGaming
- eSports
- eCommerce
- Financial Services
- Digital Goods
| Feature | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Deposit Processing | Available | ~8 payment methods, Instant (incl. weekends/holidays) |
| Withdrawal / Payout | Available | Near-instant (~30 min, incl. weekends) |
| Instant Withdrawals | Available | Near-instant (~30 min, incl. weekends) |
| KYC / AML Built-in | Available | Full auto |
| Chargeback Protection | Available | Near-zero (push payment) |
| Multi-Currency | Available | CAD |
| API Integration | Available | Single API (server-to-server) + hosted redirect |
| Local Payment Methods | Available | ~8 methods across multiple categories |
| iGaming Specialization | Available | 7-day-a-week real-time processing including weekends; sub-30-minute withdrawals once approved; single API for pay-ins and pay-outs; multiple Canadian rails (Interac, enhanced EFT, Visa Direct, Mastercard Send); near-zero chargebacks; FINTRAC-registered MSB |
| Geographic Coverage | Available | 1 countries across North America |
Pre-Built iGaming Integrations
- PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway
- BridgerPay (orchestrator routing)
- Corefy (orchestrator routing)
Pricing & Fee Structure
Fee structure and pricing model
Pricing & Fee Structure
Custom pricing model
Custom (not published)
Custom
Real-time (push)
~8
N/A
N/A
No
Pricing Details
Payper publishes no rate card; every deal is negotiated and no deposit or withdrawal percentage appears anywhere public. The structure is at least clear: Payper bills the operator for integration and processing, and the player normally pays nothing. Trade and affiliate coverage calls the rates 'fair' and set so operators don't have to surcharge, and puts Payper in the same band as the other Canadian Interac processors, but those are descriptions, not figures. The pricing advantage is the one every push-payment rail has: deposits are authorized inside the player's own bank and chargebacks run near zero (Payper cites about one in 10,000), so there is no case for a rolling reserve, and the working capital a card PSP like Nuvei or Worldpay would lock up at 5-10% for six months stays free. FX doesn't enter into it, since settlement is CAD only. The practical problem for budgeting is that there is no published rate to benchmark against, so you negotiate blind until you have a quote.
Negotiation Tips
Get the per-transaction economics in writing and put them next to a live Gigadat or Loonio quote. Three Canadian Interac rails competing for the same operators is real leverage, and Payper is the one chasing share on price and speed. Push back on any rolling reserve, because a push-payment rail with near-zero chargebacks doesn't justify one; if Payper proposes a reserve, treat it as a flag. Pin down what 'sub-30-minute withdrawals' means in the contract, since the clock starts when the casino approves the payout, which makes your own compliance turnaround part of the player's real wait, so market fast cashouts only if your internal approval keeps up. Confirm the default velocity caps (reported around CAD 10,000 a day and CAD 20,000 a week per player) and negotiate VIP limits up front. And since PCI DSS isn't confirmed publicly, ask for the attestation during onboarding instead of assuming it.
Speed & Settlement
Transaction processing and settlement timelines
Instant (incl. weekends/holidays)
Player-initiatedNear-instant (~30 min, incl. weekends)
Operator payoutReal-time (push)
To operator accountCAD only
Settlement optionsSpeed is what Payper sells. Deposits are instant: the player picks Interac at the cashier, redirects into online banking, authorizes the push, and the credit shows on the operator's side within seconds. Withdrawals are where it pulls ahead, paying out in under 30 minutes once the casino approves and running seven days a week, holidays included, against Gigadat's one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday window, so a Friday-night cashout that would sit until Tuesday on Gigadat clears in minutes here. Settlement on the push payments is effectively real-time. The catch is the 'once the casino approves' wording: the under-30-minute clock starts only after compliance greenlights the payout, so a slow internal review stretches the player's real wait no matter how fast the rail is. Among the field, Loonio runs at a similar pace with its automated Request Money flow and Paybilt clears VIP cashouts same-day on real-time ACH, while Gigadat is the slow option; among non-Interac rails Brite settles T+0 and Trustly T+1, though neither works the Canadian market the way these Interac processors do. Updated Q2 2026.
Integration & Tech
Developer experience and technical capabilities
- API Type
- Single API (server-to-server) + hosted redirect
- Onboarding
- 2-4 weeks
- Sandbox
- Test environment available through the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway integration (provider testing documentation describes deposit amount thresholds for triggering success/error states). Direct-integration sandbox is provisioned by Payper after the merchant agreement and KYB.
- Mobile SDK
- No
- White-Label
- Merchant branding in customer communications is a stated feature — the payment experience and notifications can carry the operator's brand. The actual bank-selection step is still a hosted redirect (Interac/banking restriction), so this is brandable hosted checkout rather than a fully embedded white-label cashier.
- Docs Quality
- Limited
Integration Time
1-2 weeks
Pre-Built iGaming Integrations
- PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway
- BridgerPay (orchestrator routing)
- Corefy (orchestrator routing)
Integration Assessment
One REST API covers deposits and payouts, server-to-server, with a hosted redirect on the deposit leg. The clearest public reference is the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway, where Payper is provider ID 204: deposits go through a Backend2Backend initiatePaymentRequest that returns a redirect to Payper's bank-selection page (method 343), withdrawals are Backend2Backend with no redirect (method 435), and status updates arrive over PaymentStateChangedNotification webhooks. Those docs note a per-deposit ceiling near CAD 3,000, a cap of three concurrent deposits per customer, and a 24-hour expiry on unfinished ones. Payper's own public documentation is thin, though: the real integration guides sit inside the PXP/Kalixa portal rather than on payper.ca, so an operator not coming through that gateway works from an account manager instead of open docs. There is no mobile SDK and no native SoftSwiss or EveryMatrix connector, so those platforms reach Payper through an orchestrator such as BridgerPay or Corefy or through custom work. A competent team integrates in one to two weeks.
Risk & Compliance
Licensing, fraud prevention, and regulatory compliance
Supported Gambling Licenses
- AGCO/iGaming Ontario supplier (de facto)
- offshore-friendly
- KYC/AML Automation
- Available. Full auto
- Chargeback Protection
- Available. Near-zero (push payment)
- Licenses
- FINTRAC MSB (M23617425)
- Fraud Prevention
- Machine-learning fraud checks + negative databases + layered risk tools + AML monitoring
- Responsible Gaming
- No
- Tokenization
- Player banking credentials are entered inside their own bank, never reaching the merchant. Payper's risk layer handles the transaction reference rather than exposing raw account data to the operator.
- Dispute Resolution
- Merchant support via account team; no consumer chargeback path (push payment)
Compliance Context
Payper is a FINTRAC-registered Money Services Business (registration M23617425, March 2023) covering money transferring and payment-service-provider activity, on an Ontario incorporation from May 2020, which carries the full PCMLTFA load of KYC, AML transaction monitoring and record-keeping. Fraud control runs on machine-learning risk scoring, negative databases and layered checks before funds leave an account, on top of encryption and continuous monitoring. Because the rail only pushes, the exposure is identity, account takeover and money-mule activity rather than card-not-present fraud, and the toolset is shaped to that. KYC rests on the player authenticating inside their own online banking, with the bank's identity record as the anchor; no third-party KYC vendor such as Onfido or Sumsub is named in public sources. Two things are missing. PCI DSS is plausible given the Visa Direct and Mastercard Send card-push, but nothing public confirms it, so it isn't claimed here; and Payper holds no gambling license of its own, operating instead as a supplier to iGaming-Ontario-registered operators and to offshore Kahnawake or Curacao brands serving Canadian players.
About Payper: Company Background
Company and product information
- Company Name
- Payper
- Headquarters
- Toronto, Canada
- Founded
- 2020
- Employees
- 11-50 (LinkedIn band; ~5 profiles listed)
- Company Type
- Private
- Product Type
- Local/Regional PSP
- Licenses
- FINTRAC MSB (M23617425)
- Key Products
- Interac e-Transfer Pay-Ins, Interac Online, Online Banking (enhanced EFT) deposits, Digital Cheque (EFT), Interac e-Transfer Payouts, EFT Direct Deposit, Visa Direct, Mastercard Send
- Website
- payper.ca
- Supported Verticals
- iGaming, eSports, eCommerce, Financial Services, Digital Goods
- Integration Type
- Single API (server-to-server) + hosted redirect
- Settlement Speed
- Real-time (push)
- Onboarding Speed
- 2-4 weeks
- Notable Clients
- Stake.ca
Company History
Payper Inc was incorporated in Ontario on May 15, 2020 (corporation #002756079), with a registered address at 1 Hunter Street East, Suite 100, Hamilton, Ontario, though some trade coverage still calls it Toronto-based. The premise was the one that had built Gigadat a decade earlier: Canadians pay online through Interac and bank transfer, wiring up every bank directly is painful, and merchants (iGaming operators serving Canadian players above all) want one fast integration point instead. Payper's wrinkle was to run it faster and seven days a week.
It registered as a FINTRAC Money Services Business on March 27, 2023 (M23617425, covering money transferring and payment-service-provider activity), the licensing any Canadian MSB needs. Around then it built out a gaming-specific commercial team, hiring Robert Haggan as VP of sales in 2022. Haggan had run iGaming sales at Trustly and advised Nuvei on the North American market, the background a Canadian gaming-payments specialist wants.
Through 2024 to 2026 Payper pushed hard on visibility, positioning itself against Gigadat and Paramount Commerce on the Interac rail. It exhibited at ICE London 2024, the Canadian Gaming Summit in 2023 and 2024 (where Haggan spoke on payments and compliance), and SBC Summit Canada 2026, on a floor that also held Gigadat, Paramount Commerce and iGaming Ontario. It was integrated as a server-to-server Interac method (provider ID 204) inside the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway, which put it in reach of any operator already on that gateway. By 2026 trade coverage treats Payper and Gigadat as the two most common Interac processors at Canadian gambling sites, with operators such as Stake.ca reportedly running both and routing between them by deposit size and load. Payper is the newer and faster of the two, while Gigadat has the longer track record and the wider bank reach.
What Users Say About Payper
Our analysis of 0 reviews from Trustpilot and industry sources
Trustpilot Presence
Payper has no usable review history: one Trustpilot review and nothing meaningful on G2, Capterra or Glassdoor. For a back-end processor that's expected rather than damning, but it does mean there are no verifiable operator references to fall back on either. Vet it through reference calls with existing Canadian iGaming clients, through the PXP / Kalixa gateway team that sees its performance across merchants, and by asking for the FINTRAC and PCI documentation directly rather than trusting a review score.
Notable Clients
Stake.ca
No operator client can be confirmed from public sources. Payper publishes no names, and the casinos that turn up in affiliate guides (Stake.ca, Betway, JackpotCity, PowerPlay, PlayOJO, TonyBet, Royal Vegas) are inference rather than cashier-level evidence. Stake.ca is the most-cited and is said to alternate between Payper and Gigadat by deposit amount, timing and load, but no source offers a screenshot or direct cashier observation, and players usually can't tell which processor handled a given transaction anyway. We record zero confirmed clients here rather than pad the list with names that trace back to affiliate pages. The category-level evidence is firmer: Payper is integrated as provider ID 204 in the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway, listed as a payments supplier in the iGaming Business directory, and named across trade coverage as one of the two dominant Interac processors for Canadian iGaming. That is enough to confirm a real, in-production B2B processor, just not enough to name its operators.
Operational Details
Business terms, contracts, and support
- Dedicated Account Manager
- Yes — iGaming sales/account team
- Minimum Monthly Volume
- Not published. Target is licensed/established Canadian merchants — primarily iGaming operators (AGCO/iGaming Ontario registered or offshore brands serving Canadian players) and eCommerce.
- Contract Lock-In
- N/A
- Migration Support
- Yes
- Min/Max Transaction
- CAD ~30 - CAD 3,000 per deposit (gateway docs error out above ~CAD 2,899-3,000); withdrawal velocity reported at CAD 10,000/day and CAD 20,000/week, with higher VIP limits negotiated
- Mass Payouts
- real-time + batch, Reported CAD 10,000/day and CAD 20,000/week withdrawal velocity per player by default; higher VIP limits negotiated
- Biometric / One-Click
- No
- Reporting
- Automated reconciliation + webhook state notifications
Canadian Interac e-Transfer / A2A processor for iGaming; direct Gigadat/Paramount competitor (Stake.ca reportedly load-balances Interac across Payper + Gigadat). Operating HQ Toronto; registered FINTRAC address is a Hamilton virtual office. Founder/owner not public (VP BizDev Robert Haggan, ex-Trustly/Nuvei).
Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions about Payper
Payper is a Canadian payment processor that lets merchants, mostly iGaming operators, take and pay out money over Canadian bank rails: Interac e-Transfer, Interac Online, enhanced-EFT online banking and digital cheque on deposits, and Interac e-Transfer, EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send on payouts. The player sees 'Interac' at the casino cashier, redirects into their online banking, authorizes a push payment, and Payper moves the money on the back end. It was incorporated in Ontario in 2020 and FINTRAC-registered as a Money Services Business in 2023.
Speed and weekend processing. Payper runs seven days a week, holidays included, and pays out in under 30 minutes once the casino approves; Gigadat runs Monday to Friday with a one-to-three-business-day withdrawal window. Payper also has a wider payout menu, adding Visa Direct and Mastercard Send to Interac. Gigadat is the older and deeper incumbent, with a decade-plus track record and 250-plus connected banks, while Payper is the newer and faster option with a thinner public footprint. Plenty of operators run both, and Stake.ca reportedly switches between them by amount and load.
It is a FINTRAC-registered Money Services Business (M23617425) with full PCMLTFA AML obligations, a machine-learning fraud stack with negative databases, and near-zero chargebacks because the rails only push. It serves iGaming-Ontario-regulated operators and offshore brands serving Canadian players. Two gaps matter for due diligence: PCI DSS is plausible but not publicly confirmed, and the track record is short, since Payper registered as an MSB only in 2023. Ask for the PCI attestation and reference calls directly.
There is no public rate card. Payper bills the operator, not the player, and trade coverage describes 'fair rates' set so operators don't have to surcharge, but no percentages are published. The structural advantage over a card PSP is the absence of a rolling reserve, because push payments carry near-zero chargebacks. Since there is no published number to benchmark, negotiate with a live Gigadat or Loonio quote in hand for leverage.
Under 30 minutes once the casino approves the request, seven days a week including weekends and holidays. That is the main reason operators route fast-cashout flow to Payper rather than Gigadat, which runs one to three business days, Monday to Friday. The wording to watch is 'once approved': the clock starts after your own compliance team greenlights the withdrawal, so your internal approval speed is part of the player's real wait.
No operator client can be confirmed from public data. Affiliate guides name Stake.ca, Betway, JackpotCity, PowerPlay, PlayOJO and others, but those are inference rather than cashier listings, and Payper doesn't publish operator names. Stake.ca is reported to alternate between Payper and Gigadat by deposit amount and load, with no source backing it directly. The firmer evidence is category-level: Payper is integrated as provider ID 204 in the PXP/Kalixa gateway and listed as a payments supplier in the iGaming Business directory, so it is a real in-production processor whose specific operators just can't be named from public data.
No card deposits and no crypto. The deposit side is all Canadian bank rails (Interac, enhanced EFT, digital cheque), and Visa Direct and Mastercard Send exist only on the payout side, pushing a withdrawal to the player's card. For card acquiring you need Nuvei or Worldpay; for crypto you need CoinsPaid, NOWPayments, BitPay or CoinGate. Payper is one piece of a multi-provider stack for any operator that needs more than Canadian bank rails.
No. The rails are domestic Canadian banking and settlement is CAD only. Payper has said it intends to expand internationally, but through 2026 it is Canada-exclusive. Operators that also need Europe, LATAM or APAC should run it alongside a global PSP such as Nuvei (50-plus markets), or use Trustly and Brite for European open banking and AstroPay for LATAM.
Push payments authorized inside the player's own bank have no card-rail chargeback mechanism, so chargebacks run near zero, around one in 10,000 by Payper's own figure. That is the core commercial advantage over a card MID and the reason no rolling reserve is needed. The flip side is the same as any Interac processor: once a player sends funds they are irreversible, which is the risk consumers run if they get scammed off-platform.
Gateway integration docs put the per-deposit ceiling near CAD 3,000 (transactions error out above roughly CAD 2,899-3,000), with a maximum of three concurrent deposits per customer and a 24-hour expiry on unfinished ones. Withdrawal velocity is reported at around CAD 10,000 a day and CAD 20,000 a week per player by default, with higher VIP limits negotiated. Operators serving high rollers should negotiate elevated caps up front.
Our Verdict: Should You Use Payper?
Final assessment for iGaming operators
Overall iGaming Score
Summary
Payper handles the same job as Gigadat, taking push-payment bank deposits and paying players out for Canadian iGaming, but it beats Gigadat on the parts players notice: withdrawals in under 30 minutes and processing that runs through weekends. It is FINTRAC-registered, built around gambling, led on sales by an ex-Trustly and Nuvei operator, and carries a wider payout menu than Gigadat with Visa Direct and Mastercard Send. The catches are real: Canada and CAD only, no published pricing, no public confirmation of PCI DSS, a short track record (incorporated 2020, MSB in 2023), and no operator client confirmable from public data. It is the right tool for the fast-cashout, Canadian slice of a stack rather than a base to build the whole thing on.
Strongest Point
Withdrawal speed and weekend processing on a near-zero-chargeback rail. Paying out in under 30 minutes, seven days a week, is a concrete advantage over Gigadat's one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday window, and in 2026 cashout speed is one of the main VIP retention levers in Canadian iGaming. Add the push-payment chargeback profile (about one in 10,000, no rolling reserve) and the wider payout options through Visa Direct and Mastercard Send, and you have a rail aimed at operators who compete on how fast players get paid.
Key Limitation
Maturity and transparency, in that order. A 2020 company with a 2023 registration is competing against a decade-old incumbent, with no operator client confirmable from public data and only affiliate inference to go on. Pricing is undocumented, so every operator negotiates blind, and PCI DSS stays unconfirmed despite the card-push payouts. Like Gigadat it is also single-country and single-currency, so it can't be a full stack on its own: Europe still needs Trustly or Brite, LATAM needs AstroPay, and global cards need Nuvei.
Recommendation
Use Payper for the fast-withdrawal, Canada-facing part of an operation, especially where cashout speed and weekend processing are how you compete for and keep players. Pair it with Gigadat as a deeper backup rail (running both, the way Stake.ca reportedly does, is a sound model) and with a card or crypto PSP for everything Payper doesn't touch. Since the track record is short and the pricing opaque, do the diligence the public data won't do for you: ask for the FINTRAC and PCI paperwork, get reference calls with existing clients, and benchmark the quote against Gigadat and Loonio before signing. Updated June 2026.
Pros
- Pays players out in under 30 minutes once the casino approves, seven days a week including weekends and holidays. It is the clearest advantage over Gigadat's one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday window, and cashout speed is a primary VIP retention lever in Canadian iGaming in 2026.
- A wider payout menu than plain Interac. Payouts run over Interac e-Transfer, EFT direct deposit, Visa Direct and Mastercard Send, and the card-push options get around the auto-deposit setup and security-question step that slow Interac e-Transfer withdrawals for players whose bank setup isn't ideal.
- Near-zero chargeback exposure and no rolling reserve. The rails are push payments authorized inside the player's own bank, and Payper puts its chargeback rate at roughly one in 10,000, which frees up the working capital a card PSP would otherwise lock at 5-10% for six months.
- A real gambling focus and the leadership to match. Payper markets itself for high-risk iGaming, lists in the iGaming Business directory, and runs sales under Robert Haggan, who ran iGaming sales at Trustly and advised Nuvei on the North American market. The stated 24/7/365 support matters for traffic that ignores business hours.
- FINTRAC-registered MSB with a machine-learning fraud stack. Registration M23617425 carries full PCMLTFA AML obligations, on top of ML risk scoring, negative databases and layered checks that run before funds leave an account.
- One API for both pay-ins and pay-outs, already integrated in the PXP Financial / Kalixa gateway as provider 204. Operators on that gateway reach Payper without a custom build, and a direct integration runs one to two weeks.
Cons
- Single-country, single-currency. Canada and CAD only, on domestic banking rails that stop at the border. Any operator with European, LATAM or APAC traffic needs a full second PSP stack, and Payper becomes one small rail rather than a foundation.
- Pricing is opaque. There is no public rate card and no published percentages; the merchant-pays-not-player structure and 'fair rates' framing are documented, but the numbers are negotiated blind, so you compare nothing until you have signed.
- No operator client confirmable from public data. Payper doesn't publish names, and the casinos cited in affiliate guides (Stake.ca, Betway, JackpotCity) are inference rather than cashier listings, so there are no named, checkable references for due diligence.
- Short track record. Incorporated in 2020 and FINTRAC-registered only in 2023, against Gigadat's run as the default Interac processor since the mid-2010s. Adoption is growing but not yet as wide, and there is less operational history to judge stability against.
- No card or wallet deposits, no crypto, nothing outside the Canadian bank rails. The deposit side is all account-to-account, and Visa Direct and Mastercard Send are payout-only. Card acquiring still needs Nuvei; crypto needs CoinsPaid or NOWPayments.
- Thin, gated developer documentation. The real integration guides sit inside the PXP/Kalixa portal rather than on Payper's own site, there is no open GitHub or SDK, and no native SoftSwiss or EveryMatrix connector, so platforms reach it through an orchestrator or custom work. PCI DSS is also unconfirmed in public sources.
Ready to evaluate Payper for your business?
Payper vs. Alternatives: How It Compares
Similar payment processing solutions
Payper is rarely an either/or choice, since it's one rail in one market; the real question is which Canadian Interac processor to run, or which combination, and what to pair it with for everything outside Canada. Gigadat is the incumbent for maximum Canadian reach and a decade of history, and plenty of operators run Gigadat for depth and Payper for fast weekend cashouts, the way Stake.ca reportedly does. Where Canada is only one market in a global operation, Nuvei folds Interac into a 700-plus-method, 50-plus-country integration that also covers cards, wallets and Apple/Google Pay. Most mature operators land on a Canadian Interac rail (Payper or Gigadat, often both), a global PSP for cards and a separate crypto gateway.
When to Choose an Alternative
- Gigadat
Choose Gigadat, or run it alongside Payper, if you want the deepest and most-proven Canadian Interac coverage. Gigadat has been the default processor since the mid-2010s, names 250-plus connected banks with Big 6 coverage, and has a decade-long track record Payper can't match yet. The trade-off is speed: its one-to-three-business-day, Monday-to-Friday withdrawals are what Payper beats, so the usual pattern is Gigadat for reach and Payper for fast cashouts.
- Nuvei
Choose Nuvei if Canada is part of a larger global operation. Nuvei carries Interac e-Transfer alongside 700-plus methods across 50-plus markets and bundles cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay and wallets into one API, so you avoid running a Canada-only vendor separately. The trade-off is a rolling reserve on card volume and a higher overall fee mix, plus the loss of Payper's weekend-speed edge on the Interac leg.
- 5.6

Gigadat
Local/Regional PSP- Deposit Fee
- Custom (not published)
- Settlement
- T+1 - T+3
- Methods
- 4
- Rating
- 2.4/5
- 5.4

Paramount Commerce
Open Banking PSP- Deposit Fee
- Custom (not published)
- Settlement
- T+1 - T+3
- Methods
- N/A
Related Reading
Operator guides and analysis relevant to evaluating Payper.
End of Report. Payper Provider Assessment Report 2026
Prepared and reviewed by the iGaming Payment Solutions Editorial Team ·