Skip to content

77 providers

D24

D24 Review

Is It the Right Payment Solution for Your iGaming Business?

Adequate

Local/Regional PSPVerified
Visit D24
By the Editorial Team ·

D24, the company that ran as Directa24 until an April 2023 rebrand, is a LatAm-centered local-payments aggregator that grew out of AstroPay's B2B merchant-processing arm and has been under separate ownership since November 2021. D24 runs 300+ payment methods across 30+ countries, and the LatAm core is where that reach turns concrete: deep per-country menus covering Pix in Brazil, SPEI and OXXO in Mexico, CVU transfers and Mercado Pago in Argentina, Webpay in Chile, PSE, Nequi and the new Bre-B rail in Colombia, and Yape, PLIN and PagoEfectivo in Peru, plus bank-transfer payouts claimed at under 2 hours, 7 days a week. It sells through SOFTSWISS and SoftGamings casino platforms and PXP Financial routes Brazilian Pix withdrawals through it, so the iGaming usage is real even though D24 never says the word out loud. The caveats are just as concrete: no published pricing at all, no financial-services license anywhere, zero operator clients verifiable beyond affiliate listicles, and no Trustpilot profile. A capable aggregator whose product you can inspect and whose business you cannot.

Founded London, UK (ops: Montevideo, Uruguay)300+ Payment Methods
LATAM OperatorsiGaming FriendlyFast PayoutsNot a fit: Licensed Acquiring
#Pix & SPEI#300+ Methods#2-Hour Payouts#Ex-AstroPay#Aggregated Access#No Published Pricing

Quick Info

Type
Local/Regional PSP
Founded
2018
HQ
London, UK (ops: Montevideo, Uruguay)
Pricing
Custom
APMs
300+
6.4
Adequate

iGaming Score

iGaming Fit
8.0
Geographic Coverage
6.5
Security & Compliance
4.0
Fees & Pricing
5.5
Tech & Integration
7.0
User Trust
5.0
Visit D24

Our iGaming Score: 6.4/10

Weighted scoring across five criteria

CriterionWeightScoreRating
iGaming Fit

Sells through SOFTSWISS and SoftGamings, exhibits at SiGMA and SBC, ships a Brazil bettor-registry KYC check. Never names gambling as a vertical, no iGaming-dedicated team

30%8.0Strong
Geographic Coverage

Documents real method menus for the LatAm core (BR, MX, AR, CL, CO, PE, EC plus Central America). Reaches Asia and Africa but publishes no methods for either. Zero direct acquiring anywhere

22%6.5Adequate
Security & Compliance

PCI DSS claimed, level unstated. No FCA record for the UK LLP, no BCB authorization in Brazil, no local licenses published in any market. Own KYC API with biometric and PEP/sanctions checks

20%4.0Weak
Fees & Pricing

Nothing published: no rate card, no setup fee, no FX markup, no reserve terms. Every number is negotiated, so the fee score runs on neutral NULLs

16%5.5Adequate
Tech & Integration

Single REST API for deposits, cashouts and KYC, Fragments checkout SDK, sandbox with a documented Mock PSP, GitBook docs relaunched in 2026 with llms.txt. One of the better doc sets among LatAm aggregators

12%7.0Strong
User Trust

No Trustpilot profile at all (both d24.com and directa24.com 404). Glassdoor 3.7/5 from 29 reviews is the only rated surface

0%5.0Adequate
Overall100%6.4Adequate

We score each provider on 5 weighted criteria using a 1 to 10 scale. iGaming Fit carries the most weight at 30% because that is what matters most for gambling operators. Geographic Coverage gets 22%. Security & Compliance gets 20%. Fees & Pricing gets 16%. Tech & Integration gets 12%. The final score is a weighted average of those 5. Trustpilot is shown for context but carries no weight, since player reviews of casinos are not a read on B2B acquiring quality.

Score Explanation

D24 lands where the evidence puts it: a strong iGaming fit earned on distribution rather than on client names, capped geography, and a security score held down by the absence of any published license. The iGaming dimension credits what is verifiable, which is platform distribution through SOFTSWISS and SoftGamings, trade-show presence at SiGMA and SBC, and a bettor-registry verification product built specifically for Brazil's betting rules, while noting that D24 never names the vertical publicly and runs no iGaming-dedicated team. Geography counts the 30+ country reach but caps the score because D24 owns no direct acquiring anywhere; every rail is aggregated through partners, and D24 details no methods at all for Asia or Africa. Security rests on a PCI DSS claim and a strong in-house KYC product, with nothing else to credit: no FCA, no BCB, no local payment-institution license. Fees are scored neutral because not a single number is published. Tech scores well on the single-API design, the sandbox with a Mock PSP, and documentation that is unusually good for this category. The result sits below PayRetailers and EBANX, which is the right order: both of those publish licenses D24 does not have.

Who Is D24 Best For?

The operator profiles that fit, and the ones that do not

Recommended For

  • LatAm-wide operators wanting one aggregated contract. Operators running across several LatAm markets at once who want Pix, SPEI, PSE, Yape and the cash networks under a single contract and a single API. D24's per-country menus are deep where it matters: Brazil alone covers Pix with Biometric and Automatic variants, Elo debit and bank-specific transfers, and Peru gets all three core rails (Yape, PLIN, PagoEfectivo) plus agent networks, which few aggregators publish.
  • Payout-speed competitors. Operators for whom withdrawal speed is the retention lever. D24 markets bank-transfer payouts completed in under 2 hours, 7 days a week, with Pix-key payouts in Brazil, CVU payouts in Argentina, SPEI/CLABE in Mexico and early Bre-B cashout support in Colombia. If your VIP cashouts currently wait on a Monday batch, that claim is worth testing in a pilot.
  • SOFTSWISS and SoftGamings platform operators. Casinos on SOFTSWISS or SoftGamings. D24 is listed on SOFTSWISS's payment-partners roster and SoftGamings resells it through its unified API, so an operator on either platform reaches it without custom integration work. That distribution is also the strongest public evidence that D24 processes for gambling merchants at all.
  • Teams that live in API documentation. Integration teams that judge a PSP by its docs. D24 runs GitBook docs at docs.d24.com, redesigned in 2026, covering deposits, cashouts, KYC, reconciliation and platform onboarding with real API codes per country, a sandbox, a test merchant and a documented Mock PSP. For this category that is unusually complete, and you can scope the build before ever talking to sales.

Not Recommended For

  • Operators outside LatAm. Operators whose players sit in Europe or North America beyond Canada. D24 has no European coverage and no card acquiring outside its emerging-market menus. The Asia and Africa country lists exist, but no method is publicly enumerated for any of them, so treat those regions as sales conversations rather than coverage. Nuvei or Worldpay handle the global card side; Trustly and Brite cover European open banking.
  • Compliance-gated regulated books. Licensed operators whose compliance teams require a regulated counterparty. D24 publishes no financial-services license anywhere: the UK entity is a plain LLP with no FCA record, and there is no BCB authorization in Brazil. EBANX holds a Bacen payment-institution license with direct Pix participation, and PayRetailers holds 7 local LATAM licenses. If your Brazil book runs on a .bet.br license, those two clear the regulatory bar D24 does not publicly meet.
  • Crypto-first platforms. Crypto-first casinos. D24 has no crypto on-ramp or off-ramp product, only FX-rate endpoints in the API. NOWPayments, CoinsPaid or BitPay cover that side; D24 is fiat local rails only.
  • Teams that need named references. Operators whose due diligence needs named, checkable client references. D24 claims 500+ clients and publishes none. The casino names attached to it circulate only in affiliate listicles, no case study exists, and no operator has ever been named in trade press. If your vendor process requires reference calls with named merchants, D24 cannot supply them from public data.

Geographic Coverage

Per-market verdict, regions, and market focus

One provider, two answers. The verdict flips depending on who is asking, and that is the point. The overall score rates the company. This rates the fit for your market.

Offshore operator

Curaçao / Anjouan license, serving grey and restricted markets.

Solid54best, in BR
BR casinoSolid54
BR sportsbookSolid54

Licensed operator

Holds the local license in a regulated market.

Solid51best, in BR
BR casinoSolid51
BR sportsbookSolid51

Market-by-market verdict

For an offshore operator: Solid as a casino processor in Brazil, and across the markets below.

2 Solid34 Limited
MarketCasinoSportsbook
BR Brazil
Solid54

Trade-known

Solid54

Trade-known

MX Mexico
Limited40

Provider-claimed

Limited40

Provider-claimed

AR Argentina
Limited40

Provider-claimed

Limited40

Provider-claimed

CO Colombia
Limited40

Provider-claimed

Limited40

Provider-claimed

PE Peru
Limited40

Provider-claimed

Limited40

Provider-claimed

CL Chile
Limited39

Provider-claimed

Limited39

Provider-claimed

UY Uruguay
Limited39

Provider-claimed

Limited39

Provider-claimed

CR Costa Rica
Limited39

Provider-claimed

Limited39

Provider-claimed

VE Venezuela
Limited39

Provider-claimed

Limited39

Provider-claimed

PA Panama
Limited37

Provider-claimed

Limited37

Provider-claimed

The tier is the verdict. The small number orders providers inside a tier; it is not a provider-level score. The grey line under each verdict is the evidence grade: Verified means named clients we can point to, Register-verified means the entry stands in a regulator's own register, Trade-known means known in the trade, Provider-claimed means the provider's word, discounted in the math. Full method on our methodology page.

Regions

  • LATAM
  • North America
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Africa

Coverage Analysis

The Americas carry the business. D24 documents real method menus with API codes for Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru and Ecuador, plus Bolivia, Paraguay and a Central American tail (Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Panama, Dominican Republic, Venezuela) and Canada. Beyond that it reaches 12 Asian countries (India, Japan, Indonesia, Thailand, Turkey and Vietnam among them) and 18 African ones (Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, South Africa, Egypt and a Francophone set), and for every one of those it gates the method list behind a commercial conversation. So the 30+ country footprint splits in two: a deep, documented LatAm core, and a partner-routed expansion elsewhere that an operator has to take on trust. India is the one to flag, because its PROG Act bans real-money gaming payment processing from May 2026 and D24 says nothing about how it handles that.

Regional Breakdown

Brazil: Pix dominates, including Biometric Pix and Automatic Pix specializations, alongside Elo debit, Visa/Mastercard/Amex/Hipercard cards, PicPay, MercadoPago and bank-specific deposits at Banco do Brasil, Itau, Bradesco, Caixa, Santander and Nubank. D24 dropped Boleto on January 1, 2025, when Brazil's updated betting payment rules took effect. Mexico: SPEI in embedded and redirect flavors, OXXO and OXXOPay vouchers, CoDi, cards, and a long retail cash tail through 7-Eleven, Walmart, Soriana and the Farmacias chains. Argentina: CVU/CVUX transfers on the Transferencias 3.0 rails plus Mercado Pago, with DNI/CUIL/CUIT capture required. Chile: Webpay via Transbank, MACH and Tapp wallets, and named-bank deposits, though no Khipu. Colombia: PSE, Nequi, Efecty, cash vouchers, and notably Bre-B, the instant-payment system Colombia launched in September 2025, already supported for both pay-in and cashout. Peru: Yape, PLIN, PagoEfectivo, the Tupay QR suite, Niubiz agents and caja networks, which is one of the deepest public Peru menus in the category. Ecuador runs in USD on bank deposits and cash vouchers, with the Banco Pichincha rail out of service through 2026. Uruguay, Paraguay and Bolivia are covered too but sit outside this catalog's market taxonomy.

Key Features for iGaming Operators

Products, payment methods, and verticals

Key Products

Payins, Payouts, KYC Tools, QuickPay, Fragments checkout, Platform Booster, Payment Links

Two core flows and a toolbelt around them. Payins cover the per-country method menus through the Deposits API, Fragments SDK or hosted checkout, with QuickPay as a deposit UX product marketed around skipping lengthy KYC steps (shortlisted for SBC Awards 2023 Payment Solution of the Year). Payouts run through the Cashouts API and merchant panel, with the headline claim of bank transfers completed in under 2 hours, 7 days a week, and payout rails across ten Americas countries including Pix keys in Brazil, CVU in Argentina and SPEI/CLABE in Mexico. Around those sit KYC Tools (a standalone verification API with document, biometric, PEP/sanctions and bettor-registry checks), Payment Links, a Reconciliation API, and Platform Booster, a sub-merchant onboarding product that lets marketplaces and aggregators run merchants under D24 as the processor of record.

Payment Methods

D24 quotes 300+ methods and documents roughly 200, a gap that closes only if every voucher chain and bank rail counts separately. The character of the menu is cash-heavy and transfer-heavy, built for markets where cards underperform: instant bank rails (Pix, SPEI, CVU, PSE, Bre-B), wallets (Mercado Pago, Nequi, Yape, PLIN, MACH, PicPay), and wide cash-voucher networks from OXXO to Efecty to PagoEfectivo. Two product details stand out for 2026. First, D24 tracks new national rails quickly: Bre-B support landed within months of Colombia's September 2025 launch, and it ships Biometric and Automatic Pix as dedicated specializations. Second, the Boleto removal cuts the other way and says more: when Brazil's betting rules restricted bettor payments to Pix, TED and debit from January 1, 2025, D24 dropped Boleto, which is how a processor behaves when its Brazilian volume is betting-shaped. Everything is aggregated, since D24 holds no local acquiring license in any market and reaches each rail through partner institutions.

Verticals

The supported-verticals list runs iGaming, eCommerce, marketplaces, trading, mobility and hospitality, and the gambling entry needs decoding, because D24 itself never calls gambling or betting a served vertical; the closest it comes is labelling the category 'Gaming'. The evidence sits one level down. D24 is on the SOFTSWISS payment-partners roster with a testimonial, SoftGamings resells it to casino operators, PXP Financial routes Brazilian Pix withdrawals through it, its QuickPay deposit product was shortlisted for an SBC Award in 2023, its CCO posts from SiGMA Malta, and its KYC tool advertises a check for 'athletes and people prevented from betting', a bettor-registry feature nobody builds for e-commerce. Deriv, a CFD broker, publishes deposit guides for D24 bank transfer, so the adjacent high-risk verticals are real too. The pattern is a company that serves iGaming openly at the industry level while keeping its corporate site quiet about it.

  • iGaming
  • eCommerce
  • Marketplaces
  • Trading
  • Mobility
  • Hospitality
Methods
300+
Crypto
None
Currencies
BRL, MXN, ARS, CLP, COP, PEN, USD, CAD, + local currencies
iGaming
2
FeatureStatusDetails
Deposit ProcessingAvailable300+ payment methods, Instant (Pix/SPEI/wallets); cash vouchers on confirmation
Withdrawal / PayoutAvailableUnder 2 hours claimed (bank transfers, 7 days/week)
Instant WithdrawalsNot availableUnder 2 hours claimed (bank transfers, 7 days/week)
KYC / AML Built-inAvailableFull auto (embedded KYC API)
Chargeback ProtectionNot availableMerchant
Multi-CurrencyAvailableBRL, MXN, ARS, CLP, COP, PEN, USD, CAD, + local currencies
API IntegrationAvailableSingle API + SDK
Local Payment MethodsAvailableLocal rails in 18 markets
iGaming SpecializationAvailableDeep per-country LatAm method menus + bank-transfer payouts under 2 hours, 7 days a week
Geographic CoverageAvailable30 countries across LATAM, North America, Asia-Pacific, Africa

Pricing & Fee Structure

Fee structure and pricing model

Rate Card

Custom
Deposit Fee

Contact

Withdrawal Fee

Contact

Settlement

Not published

Methods

300+

Setup / Monthly

Not published

Integration Fee

Not published

Revenue Share

No

Pricing Details

Nothing is published. No deposit or withdrawal percentage, no setup fee, no FX markup, no rolling reserve, no minimum volume, no contract length, not on d24.com, not in the docs, not anywhere third-party that holds up. The 0-2% figures that float around affiliate pages describe player-side conversion fees, not merchant pricing. That puts D24 in the same opaque bucket as most of the grey-adjacent LatAm aggregators and behind PayRetailers, whose 1.5-3% deposit band and 6-10% reserve terms at least give you a negotiating anchor. Structurally, most of D24's menu is push-payment rails (Pix, SPEI, CVU, PSE, wallets, cash vouchers) where chargebacks barely exist, which weakens any case for a heavy rolling reserve; whether D24 prices that way is unknowable until you get a term sheet.

Speed & Settlement

Transaction processing and settlement timelines

Deposit

Instant (Pix/SPEI/wallets); cash vouchers on confirmation

Player-initiated
Withdrawal

Under 2 hours claimed (bank transfers, 7 days/week)

Operator payout
Settlement

Not published

To operator account
Currencies

Local + international settlement (unspecified)

Settlement options
Refund ProcessingNot published

Deposits are instant on the rails that dominate the menu: Pix, SPEI, CVU, PSE and the wallets confirm in seconds, while cash vouchers credit on store confirmation, which can mean hours to a day for an OXXO or Efecty payment. The payout claim is the differentiator D24 leads with: bank transfers completed in under 2 hours, 7 days a week, backed by Pix-key payouts in Brazil, CVU in Argentina, SPEI/CLABE in Mexico and Bre-B cashout in Colombia. That would beat PayRetailers' sub-24-hour window and match the fastest local specialists, though the claim is D24's own and carries no SLA behind it. Merchant settlement is the blind spot: no settlement period, currency schedule or local-entity detail is published anywhere, against PayRetailers' known T+1 to T+3, so settlement terms go on the negotiation list rather than the spec sheet.

Integration & Tech

Developer experience and technical capabilities

API Type
Single API + SDK
Onboarding
Not published
Sandbox
Sandbox + test merchant + documented Mock PSP
Mobile SDK
No
White-Label
Fragments embeddable checkout + hosted payment flows
Docs Quality
Good

Pre-Built iGaming Integrations

  • SoftSwiss
  • SoftGamings
View API Documentation

Integration Assessment

One REST API family covers deposits, cashouts and KYC, with signature-based auth, webhooks for status changes, and validation endpoints for bank codes, Pix keys and account data. Checkout options run from the Fragments embeddable SDK (all-in-one or Lite) to hosted flows, and there are Shopify, WooCommerce and Magento plugins from the 2023 rebrand era plus Java and PHP server SDKs on GitHub (3 public repos, low activity). Documentation is the strong point: GitBook-based, redesigned in 2026, with country specialization pages (SPEI Offline, QuickPay, Biometric Pix, Automatic Pix), a sandbox, a test merchant and a documented Mock PSP, plus llms.txt for AI-assisted integration work. No published integration or onboarding timeline exists, and there is no native mobile SDK. Platform operators skip most of this: SOFTSWISS and SoftGamings connectors are pre-built, D24 is also reachable through Yuno's payment orchestration layer (partnership announced August 2024), while EveryMatrix, Altenar, Digitain and Slotegrator ship no D24 connector.

Risk & Compliance

Licensing, fraud prevention, and regulatory compliance

KYC/AML Automation
Available. Full auto (embedded KYC API)
Chargeback Protection
Not available. Merchant
Licenses
PCI DSS (claimed); no financial-services licenses published
Fraud Prevention
Proprietary antifraud + ML payer scoring
Responsible Gaming
No
Tokenization
Card-on-file / stored-cards endpoints in the Deposits API
Dispute Resolution
Not published

Compliance Context

The compliance picture is thin. D24 claims PCI DSS with tokenized card processing but states no level. The corporate entity, DIRECTA24 LLP, is a UK limited liability partnership registered at its law firm's address with no FCA authorization, and it holds no Brazilian BCB authorization, no Mexican license and no other financial-services registration in any operating market. That gap bites hardest in Brazil, where betting payments must move through BCB-authorized institutions: D24 claims no Brazilian entity of its own, so it settles through authorized partners rather than as one. What it does have is a serious KYC product: document and biometric verification, PEP and sanctions screening, Pix-key and bank-account validation, and the Brazil bettor-registry check, sold both embedded in the payment flow and as a standalone API. Fraud control runs on proprietary machine-learning payer scoring. Chargeback liability stays with the merchant, though most of the menu is push-payment rails where chargebacks barely exist.

Regulatory Position

D24 holds no financial-services license. DIRECTA24 LLP is a UK partnership without FCA authorization, registered at the address of its law firm, and it carries no BCB, CNBV or other local authorization in any operating market. PCI DSS is claimed without a stated level. The KYC and compliance tooling is the counterweight: document and biometric verification, PEP and sanctions screening, and Brazil-specific features like the bettor-registry check and Pix-key validation that exist because of Law 14.790's requirements on betting payments. Dropping Boleto in January 2025 in response to Brazilian regulation shows the company adjusting its rails to gambling-payment rules in practice. The structure to underwrite is a partner-routed aggregator: your money moves through locally authorized institutions D24 contracts with, not through a licensed D24 entity, and the counterparty you sign with is a UK LLP controlled from Panama via a BVI holding company.

About D24: Company Background

Company and product information

Company Name
D24
Headquarters
London, UK (ops: Montevideo, Uruguay)
Founded
2018
Employees
201-500 self-declared; trackers estimate ~55
Company Type
Private
Product Type
Local/Regional PSP
Licenses
PCI DSS (claimed); no financial-services licenses published
Key Products
Payins, Payouts, KYC Tools, QuickPay, Fragments checkout, Platform Booster, Payment Links
Supported Verticals
iGaming, eCommerce, Marketplaces, Trading, Mobility, Hospitality
Integration Type
Single API + SDK
Settlement Speed
Not published
Onboarding Speed
Not published
Named iGaming Clients
Not published

Company History

The lineage runs through three of LatAm fintech's better-known companies, and D24's own 'established in 2009' claim only makes sense against it. AstroPay was founded in Uruguay in 2009 by Sergio Fogel and Andres Bzurovski, who later spun off dLocal in 2016 (Nasdaq IPO 2021). The merchant-processing side of AstroPay's business became Directa24: the legal entity, DIRECTA24 LLP, was incorporated in London on December 21, 2018 (Companies House OC425353) with the AstroPay founders as its controlling persons. The operational separation followed around 2020, when AstroPay moved its processing business into D24 to concentrate on the consumer wallet. So 2009 is inherited experience and 2018 is the company. The legacy naming still lingers at partners: PXP Financial calls the connector 'Directa24 (also called Astropay)' to this day.

The ownership break came on November 30, 2021, and it is the load-bearing fact for anyone comparing D24 to AstroPay today. On that date Fogel and Bzurovski ceased to be persons with significant control, and the sole active PSC since is Jonathan Kier Joffe, an Argentine national resident in Panama, holding 75% or more of voting rights through Slean Investment Inc., a British Virgin Islands company that joined as corporate member of the LLP. No funding round or acquisition price exists on record. The practical consequences: D24 is not AstroPay, the FCA restrictions that hit AstroPay's UK entity in June 2024 leave D24 untouched, and the company answers to a Panama-resident individual through a BVI holding, an offshore-flavored structure worth knowing about and not more than that. Operations stayed in Montevideo, where the working HQ remains.

The rebrand from Directa24 to D24 came in April 2023, alongside Shopify, WooCommerce and Magento plugins, and 2023 was also the year the company showed up most visibly where iGaming money is: QuickPay shortlisted at the SBC Awards, leadership posting from SiGMA Malta, and Luca Visco Gilardi, who joined from a decade at Paysafe as COO, moving to the CCO seat. Since then the pattern has been product work without press: Boleto dropped on January 1, 2025 when Brazil's betting payment rules bit, Bre-B support added within months of Colombia's September 2025 launch, Biometric and Automatic Pix documented as specializations, and a full docs relaunch in 2026. There has been no funding news, no license announcement and no named partnership in trade press for two years. Publicly, it is a quiet company shipping features.

What Users Say About D24

What the review record shows, and what it does not

Trustpilot Presence

D24 has no Trustpilot profile at all, under either the current name or the legacy Directa24 one. That is the normal state for a processor players never see by name, but it removes the easiest outside check on service quality. Vet D24 the way its actual customers would: reference calls with merchants you obtain from its commercial team, a conversation with SOFTSWISS or SoftGamings about connector performance, and a pilot with real volume before routing anything critical. Ignore ratings attached to directa.it or directa.co.uk, which belong to unrelated companies.

Client Evidence

D24 claims 500+ clients and 260M+ monthly transactions, and not one of those clients is verifiable. It never filled in its own case-studies section, which still runs the CMS placeholder entries about healthcare and urban development instead of client stories. No operator has been named in trade press either, and the casino names in circulation (BetBoom, 22Bet, Betway, Brazino777, PlayOJO and others) trace back exclusively to affiliate listicles that recycle each other without cashier screenshots or operator statements. None of them belongs in a client list. What holds up instead is category-level evidence: the SOFTSWISS payment-partners listing, SoftGamings reselling D24 to its casino operators, PXP Financial routing Brazilian Pix withdrawals through it, connector listings at Rebilly and NORBr, an August 2024 partnership that put D24's APM menu on Yuno's orchestration platform, and Deriv's published deposit guides on the trading side. That establishes a real, in-production processor with gambling-platform distribution. It does not establish who runs on it, and an operator doing due diligence should ask D24 directly for referenceable merchants.

Operational Details

Business terms, contracts, and support

Dedicated Account Manager
Not published
Minimum Monthly Volume
Not published
Contract Lock-In
Not published
Migration Support
No
Min/Max Transaction
Not published
Mass Payouts
API + batch (Merchant Panel) · No published limit
Biometric / One-Click
Yes
Reporting
Reconciliation API + merchant panel

Nothing about the commercial relationship is published: no rate card, no minimum volume, no contract length, no reserve terms, no settlement schedule, and no onboarding timeline. Every one of those becomes a negotiation item, and the diligence list is longer than usual because D24 holds no license of its own — funds settle through partner institutions it does not name, so ask which ones per market. Payouts run through the Cashouts API or in batches from the merchant panel, with the headline claim of bank transfers inside two hours, seven days a week, and no SLA published behind it. Reconciliation has its own API alongside the panel. There is no migration program for an operator moving off another processor, and no dedicated account manager is advertised.

Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions about D24

Our Verdict: Should You Use D24?

Final assessment for iGaming operators

Adequate

Overall iGaming Score

Summary

D24 is a real, documented, iGaming-friendly LatAm aggregator with one of the better public doc sets in the category, deep method menus across seven core markets, and a payout-speed pitch worth testing. It is also a company you largely cannot verify: no published pricing, no license anywhere, no named client, no Trustpilot profile, and ownership that resolves to a Panama resident through a BVI holding. The AstroPay pedigree explains the product maturity but has not belonged to the story since the founders sold control in November 2021.

Strongest Point

Per-market depth you can actually read before you buy. D24 documents real API codes for Pix with Biometric and Automatic variants, SPEI embedded and redirect, CVU, Webpay, PSE, Nequi, Bre-B within months of its Colombian launch, and the full Peruvian trio of Yape, PLIN and PagoEfectivo, plus cash networks everywhere. Combined with the under-2-hour, 7-day payout claim and a single API across deposits, cashouts and KYC, that is a stronger verifiable product surface than most LatAm aggregators show publicly.

Key Limitation

Verifiability. Every commercial and regulatory fact an operator would underwrite is unpublished: fees, reserves, settlement mechanics, licenses, clients. The 500+ clients and 260M+ monthly transactions claims stand entirely on D24's word. PayRetailers and EBANX both clear a bar D24 does not attempt in public, which is showing a license. Until D24 publishes terms or names merchants, every engagement starts with a diligence project.

Recommendation

As of mid-2026, quote D24 when LatAm is a core region and you want method depth, fast payouts and one aggregated contract, especially if you already run SOFTSWISS or SoftGamings. Run it against PayRetailers and EBANX for the same corridors, demand per-method pricing and the identity of the settling partner institutions in each market, and pilot Brazil and Peru volume before committing anything critical. Skip it if your compliance framework requires a licensed counterparty or named references.

Pros

  • Deep, publicly documented method menus across the LatAm core: Pix (with Biometric and Automatic variants), SPEI, OXXO, CVU, Webpay, PSE, Nequi, Yape, PLIN, PagoEfectivo and wide cash-voucher networks, enumerated with real API codes rather than marketing lists.
  • Fast payout rails as the headline product: bank transfers claimed at under 2 hours, 7 days a week, with Pix-key, CVU, SPEI/CLABE and Bre-B cashout support across ten Americas countries through one Cashouts API.
  • Quick adoption of new national rails. Bre-B support arrived within months of Colombia's September 2025 launch for both pay-in and cashout, and Biometric and Automatic Pix are documented as dedicated specializations, which signals live engineering investment in the region.
  • Documentation quality unusual for the category: GitBook docs relaunched in 2026 with per-country pages, sandbox, test merchant, a documented Mock PSP and llms.txt, so an integration team can scope the build before talking to sales.
  • Real iGaming distribution: listed on SOFTSWISS's payment-partners roster, resold by SoftGamings, routing Brazilian Pix withdrawals for PXP Financial, SBC Awards 2023 shortlist and SiGMA presence, plus a Brazil bettor-registry KYC check built for betting compliance.
  • A serious in-house KYC product sold standalone or embedded: document and biometric verification, PEP and sanctions screening, Pix-key and bank-account validation, which most aggregators this size buy from vendors instead of building.

Cons

  • Zero pricing transparency. No rate card, setup fee, FX markup, reserve terms, minimum volume or contract length is published anywhere, so every operator negotiates blind and comparison shopping requires collecting quotes.
  • No financial-services license on record in any market: the UK LLP has no FCA authorization, there is no BCB authorization in Brazil, and PCI DSS is claimed without a level. Everything settles through unnamed partner institutions.
  • No verifiable client despite a 500+ clients claim. No case studies, no trade-press-named operators; the circulating casino names live only in affiliate listicles. Due diligence has nothing public to grab.
  • Aggregated access everywhere with zero direct acquiring, which means D24 inherits its partners' coverage, approval rates and failure modes, and its reach stays capped by theirs. Asia and Africa coverage publishes no methods at all.
  • Offshore-opaque ownership: controlled since November 2021 by a Panama-resident individual through a BVI holding company, with no funding history or investor names on record. Not disqualifying, but a real KYB consideration for a payments counterparty.
  • No Trustpilot, G2 or Capterra presence at all, and only 29 Glassdoor reviews (3.7/5) as a rated surface, so third-party operational signal is close to zero and namesakes like directa.it crowd the search results.

Ready to evaluate D24 for your business?

D24 vs. Alternatives: How It Compares

Similar payment processing solutions

The LatAm aggregator field splits on what you can verify. PayRetailers is the closest like-for-like: same aggregated multi-country model, but with 7 local licenses and semi-published pricing. EBANX is the Brazil-anchored enterprise option with a Bacen license and direct Pix participation. AstroPay shares D24's DNA but sells the opposite product, a player-facing wallet with brand recognition. Brazil-only operators can go narrower and cheaper with a Pix specialist like Pay4Fun, and the retail giants Mercado Pago and PagSeguro process gambling volume with household-name trust but no iGaming account management. Most operators pair any of these with a global PSP like Nuvei for cards and everything outside the region.

When to Choose an Alternative

  • PayRetailers

    Choose PayRetailers if you want the same aggregated LatAm contract from a counterparty you can verify: 7 local licenses, a BCB-licensed Brazilian entity via Transfeera, a live connector on Corefy's orchestration platform, and known pricing bands (1.5-3% deposits). D24 publishes neither pricing nor licensing.

  • EBANX

    Choose EBANX if Brazil is the core market and the regulated .bet.br framework applies to you. It is a Bacen-licensed payment institution and direct Pix participant, which is the compliance gate Brazilian betting payments run through; D24 reaches Pix only through partners.

  • AstroPay

    Choose AstroPay if player-facing brand recognition and a payout wallet matter more than raw method count. Same corporate lineage as D24, opposite model: a consumer wallet players know from Premier League sponsorships versus an invisible back-end aggregator.

  • Pay4Fun

    Choose Pay4Fun if you only need Brazil and want a licensed local player: a Brazilian iGaming wallet and gateway operating under local authorization with named operator relationships, instead of D24's partner-routed pan-LatAm menu.

  • Mercado Pago

    Choose Mercado Pago if Argentine and Brazilian players' wallet trust drives your conversion. It is the rail D24 itself resells in Argentina, and going direct removes a hop, though you get a mass-market PSP with no iGaming-specific support.

  • PagSeguro

    Choose PagSeguro if you want a listed, Bacen-regulated Brazilian processor with retail scale behind your Pix volume and can live with a generalist's appetite for gambling merchants instead of an aggregator that courts them.

Often Paired With

Providers that complement D24

  • PayRetailers

    PayRetailers

    Local LATAM PSP
    5.8
    Deposit Fee
    1.5-3%
    Settlement
    T+1 - T+3
    Methods
    300+
    Rating
    3/5
  • EBANX

    EBANX

    Local Methods PSP
    5.4
    Deposit Fee
    2.7% + $0.30 (published)
    Settlement
    D+1 to D+7 by method
    Methods
    200+
    Rating
    2.8/5
  • AstroPay

    AstroPay

    Local Methods PSP
    7.4
    Deposit Fee
    1-2.5%
    Settlement
    T+1 - T+2
    Methods
    50+
    Rating
    4.3/5
  • PayU

    PayU

    Full-Stack PSP
    6.1
    Deposit Fee
    ~2% flat (India retail tier) / custom enterprise
    Settlement
    T+2
    Methods
    150+
    Rating
    1.2/5

Related Reading

Operator guides and analysis relevant to evaluating D24.

End of Report. D24 Provider Assessment Report 2026

Prepared and reviewed by the iGaming Payment Solutions Editorial Team ·

Last verified: