Skip to content
iGaming Payment Solutions

78 providers

The market that polices gambling through the payment system, with a 1947 law on the wall · Updated Aug 2, 2026

iGaming payments in Mexico

Mexico regulates gambling with a law it has not amended since 1947, so the real regulator is the money. The 2026 tax code charges offshore books 50% of gross receipts with no prize deduction, names the payment intermediary as a nexus test, and carries an ISP-blocking sanction that has never once been used. When Mexico actually took betting sites down, it did it the other way around: freezing the bank access of licensed brands, bet365.mx and betano.mx among them, and keeping ten permitted sites dark straight through the World Cup it co-hosted. The permit register underneath is stranger than either story: one 2005 permit carries 78 authorized domains, including the local skins of Stake, BC.Game and Roobet.

betting: regulatedcasino: regulatedSee it on the map
Instant bank transfer / RTPMarket dataBy the iGaming Payment Solutions Editorial Team

20

Providers with a rail here

5

Reach it directly

4

Local rails

MXN

Settles in

Quick info

Currency
MXN
Region
LATAM
Betting
regulated
Casino
regulated
Dominant rail
Instant bank transfer / RTP
Providers
20 (5 direct)
Regulator
SEGOB
Enforcement
no site or payment blocking

A 1947 law, a 2004 regulation, and a register where Stake rides a 2005 permit

How online gambling legally exists in Mexico without an online license

The Ley Federal de Juegos y Sorteos has never been amended since December 31, 1947. It prohibits games of chance nationwide and lets SEGOB permit a short list of exceptions, and everything else lives one level down, in the 2004 Reglamento. Online betting exists because Articles 85 and 86 of that regulation let a permitted establishment take bets 'via Internet, telephone or electronically'. There is no standalone online license; every Mexican gambling site is legally an annex of somebody's land-based permit. That is why the market runs on skins: SEGOB's own registry maps around 119 authorized domains onto 73 permit records held by 43 companies, and the mappings are stranger than the trade press assumes.

A permit family issued in May 2005 and expiring May 24, 2030, whose Producciones Moviles branch carries 78 of those domains, hosts stake.mx, bcgame.mx and roobet.mx: the crypto-casino generation acquired legal Mexican storefronts by renting a twenty-year-old permit. The register also shows how fast the skins machine works procedurally. Ganador Azteca, the TV Azteca vehicle, got its permit on September 13, 2018, for 25 years; an amendment on November 7, 2018, bolted on third-party online operation, DGJS approved the bet365.mx domain three weeks later, and bet365 went live in mid-2019 on somebody else's paper that runs to 2043. The November 2023 decree that trade coverage calls an online crackdown did something narrower: it banned slot machines outright, capped new permits at 15 years, abolished the operator figure, and barred renewal of slot-based permits. Twenty brand-new permits were still registered in February 2024, after the decree, via a court order to a single company whose majority partner the anti-corruption group MCCI later tied to a cartel-linked network. The register, not the statute, is where Mexican gambling law actually happens.

Mexico took down licensed sites by freezing their money, and the freeze outlived the courts

The UIF wave that kept bet365.mx dark through a home World Cup

Mexico's biggest gambling enforcement action in memory did not touch a single offshore site. On the night of November 11, 2025, the finance ministry's intelligence unit, the UIF, put 13 casino operators on its blocked-persons list over suspected money laundering, freezing their bank access, and SEGOB suspended their operations the same day, physical floors and ten licensed online domains alike, bet365.mx and betano.mx among them, both riding the Ganador Azteca permit of Grupo Salinas. Two days later, in an explicitly coordinated action, FinCEN issued a finding and proposed rulemaking under Section 311, its first aimed at gambling establishments, naming transactions of ten Mexico-based casinos a class of primary money-laundering concern. The proposed special measure would cut them off from US correspondent accounts, though it imposed nothing yet. OFAC designated 27 targets the same day. The alleged typologies were payment typologies: bets funded through stolen identities, prepaid cards, digital codes, and transfers with no verified origin.

  1. Nov 11-12, 2025done

    UIF blocks 13 casino operators' bank access; SEGOB suspends their physical and online operations, ten licensed domains among them

  2. Nov 13, 2025done

    FinCEN proposes Section 311 special measures on ten Mexican casinos; OFAC designates 27 targets in the same coordinated action

  3. Dec 18, 2025done

    A federal judge grants Ganador Azteca a definitive suspension; SEGOB petitions to remove the judge

  4. Mar 22, 2026done

    An amparo orders bet365.mx and betano.mx reinstated within days

  5. Jul 5, 2026in force

    Ten domains still dark through the World Cup Mexico co-hosted, because the UIF listing kept the payments frozen

  6. Pendingahead

    Criminal charges or UIF delisting; the announced complaints had not become confirmed indictments by August 2026

Betano's operator had shown a freshly renewed authorization, dated October 9, 2025, and valid to December 10, 2026, a month before the freeze. The renewal did not matter, and neither did the amparo.

One tax rate, two tax bases, and only one of them is survivable

The IEPS decree of November 7, 2025, in force January 1, 2026

The gambling IEPS jumped from 30% to 50% on January 1, 2026, by a standalone decree published on November 7, 2025, and signed by President Sheinbaum two days earlier. Congress passed it over the industry association's warning that it would push players offshore. The rate is only half the story. For SEGOB permit holders the base stays what it was: amounts received from players minus prizes actually paid and stakes returned, a gross-revenue-like base with a carryforward when prizes exceed a month's take. For foreign operators without a Mexican establishment, a new paragraph of Article 18 sets the base at the total amounts received from participants, in the law's own words 'sin disminucion alguna', with no deduction for prizes at all.

Under the 2026 IEPSLicensed permit holderOffshore platform
Rate50% (was 30% through 2025)50%, newly applied
Tax baseWagers received minus prizes paid and returned stakesGross receipts from players, no deductions of any kind
What that means at real payout ratiosA heavy tax on gross revenueA tax several times larger than gross revenue itself; arithmetically unpayable for a normal book
RegistrationSEGOB permit under the 1947 lawRFC registration with SAT, Mexican legal representative, e.firma; compliance expressly creates no permanent establishment
Who remitsThe operator, monthly, with real-time betting-system feeds to SATThe platform, by the 17th of the following month; intermediation platforms withhold 100% of the tax
SanctionEstablishment closureTemporary ISP blocking of the service, borrowed from the VAT digital-services regime

The location tests come from the VAT digital-services regime: a player counts as Mexican if they give a Mexican address, use a Mexican IP or phone number, or pay through an intermediary located in Mexico. The payment rail is itself a nexus. A ten-day transition let pre-2026 services settle at 30%, related parties excluded. The finance ministry projects MXN 5,024.7 million of gambling IEPS for 2026 in the revenue law; the industry association projects the opposite, arguing a 50% gross-base tax collects nothing because nobody rational registers to pay it. Seven months in, the register suggests the industry has the better of the argument.

The blocking power exists, the register is empty, and the trigger has never been pulled

SAT's list, the 18-H mechanism, and who actually carries the liability

278

Foreign digital providers on SAT's register

The DOF list of May 22, 2026, cutoff 30 April: Netflix-class platforms, SaaS, marketplaces

0

Gambling brands among them

No bet365, no Betano, no Stake; four months into the 50% regime, no offshore book had registered

Never

Times the ISP-blocking power has been used

Since the mechanism went live in 2021, no DOF publication names any blocked provider, gambling or otherwise

The blocking procedure is purely administrative: one SAT official of administrador general rank orders the telecom concessionaires to block within five days, after a 15-day cure window. No court order is required. It has still never happened to anyone.

The design has two quirks a payments professional should know. First, there is no acquirer backstop: the statute puts no withholding duty on Mexican card acquirers or PSPs for payments to unregistered foreign gambling platforms. Instead, Article 18-I of the VAT law shifts the make-up liability to the Mexican user, who is supposed to self-assess the tax as an import. The player, not the processor, is the legal backstop, which is to say there is none in practice. Second, the surveillance layer is stacking: from April 1, 2026, a new Article 30-B of the Federal Tax Code requires digital platforms to give SAT permanent, real-time access to their systems, with the same blocking sanction for refusal. Mexico has built a complete offshore-enforcement machine out of tax law. What it has not done, anywhere, ever, is switch it on.

Cash flows both ways, SPEI wears an STP badge, and the AML wire is set at 645 UMA

What a licensed Mexican cashier actually runs on

RailInOutThe catch
SPEI (via STP virtual CLABEs)Yes, from any bankThe main payout rail; about two hours for verified accounts at the market leaderPlayers are instructed to pick 'STP MEX', a fintech SOFOM, as the destination bank, not a retail brand they know
OXXOCash against a 14-digit reference, credited in about five minutes; store fee MXN 10-13; MXN 10,000 per order via aggregatorsCash pickup from MXN 220 where enabledCash in both directions, inside federal AML limits
Cards and Apple PayVisa and Mastercard after pre-registering the cardNoThe leader's own terms warn that some banks block gambling charges; HSBC strips gambling of rewards accrual, grouping it with cash advances
Vouchers (ToditoCash, paysafecard)Up to 10 PINs per paymentNoAnonymity ends where identification thresholds start
Casino cage cashMXN 20 to 45,000 per day; documentation above MXN 21,000Cash at the sportsbook counterThe federal cash prohibition caps large cash prize payments outright

Reconstructed from the market leader's own published cashier terms and aggregator documentation. No official deposit-mix statistic exists for Mexico; nobody publishes rail shares, and any percentage you see is folklore.

The AML frame does publish its numbers. Gambling is a 'vulnerable activity' under Mexico's anti-laundering law: operators must identify any player transacting above 325 UMA, MXN 38,126 in 2026, and file a notice to the financial intelligence unit above 645 UMA, MXN 75,665, by the 17th of the following month. The sector filed 202,045 such notices in the first five months of 2026 alone, flagging at least MXN 15.3 billion, against 405,427 notices in all of 2024. Meanwhile the state-built retail rails stay out of the game entirely: Banxico's CoDi has 21.8 million validated accounts and only about a tenth have ever transacted, DiMo reached some 12 million registrations, and no licensed gambling cashier documents accepting either. The rail that matters is plain SPEI, which cleared about seven billion operations in 2025, most of them in exactly the under-MXN-10,000 band where gambling deposits live.

  • SPEIdominant

    instant bank transfer

    SPEI, Banxico's instant interbank rail, is the primary way players deposit and withdraw at licensed books. Cashiers run it over virtual CLABEs issued by STP, so a provider needs direct SPEI acquiring and automatic matching of each payment to its CLABE and reference.

  • OXXO Paymajor

    vouchers & cash

    OXXO takes cash at 20,000+ stores and runs in both directions at the market leader, with deposits paid in against a reference and payouts collected at the counter. Mexico's anti-money-laundering law (LFPIORPI) bounds the rail with identification above 325 UMA, a UIF notice above 645 UMA and a federal cash cap on large prize payments.

  • CoDi / DiMominor

    instant bank transfer

    CoDi and DiMo are Banxico's QR and phone-number payments on SPEI rails. No licensed gambling cashier accepts either, and only 2.2M of CoDi's 21.8M validated accounts have ever transacted.

  • Visa/Mastercardminor

    local cards

    Cards work at licensed books once the player pre-registers them, though some issuers block gambling charges and card deposits lean to debit. Mexico has no rule that makes issuers block gambling merchant codes.

SPEI
14 · 5 direct
OXXO Pay
9 · 4 direct
CoDi / DiMo
3 · 1 direct
Visa/Mastercard
none
Direct acquiring Aggregated or indirect

A rail with one provider behind it is a single point of failure, whatever the headline coverage number says.

The tax jumped 20 points and the market grew anyway, straight through a home World Cup

The full lasagna, layer by layer, and who absorbed it

% federal IEPS on gaming revenue

20
2008 (introduced)
30
2010
50
2026
The federal excise is only the top layer. Below it sit state taxes of around 10% on player spend, collected by the operator in roughly 25 states, plus state prize taxes near 6%. Then a federal participation of 1% of handle at remote books, 16% VAT on the offshore digital service, and a player-side withholding of 1% federally, rising to 21% where the state prize tax exceeds 6%. Mexico City alone stacks 13% on operator takings and 6% on winnings.

The strange part is what did not happen: the licensed market absorbed the 20-point jump and grew through it. Codere Online, the one operator that publishes Mexican numbers, took EUR 63 million in World Cup stakes, 180% above the 2022 tournament, added roughly 40,000 customers around the event, grew Mexico revenue 21% in the second quarter, and raised its full-year guidance by EUR 20 million at the half-year mark, in the very year the IEPS went from 30% to 50%. Caliente, the market leader, publishes nothing, but Playtech's 30.8% stake in its online holding contributed EUR 55 million of EBITDA and EUR 33 million of dividends in 2025, on an original EUR 17 million investment the company values at more than forty times cost. The industry association claims about 60% of online betting sites serving Mexicans are illegal and warned the tax would feed them; it also reported platforms doubling their customer counts during the tournament, with in-play betting spiking as much as 150% during hydration breaks. Independent sizing is contested, with 2025 online estimates running from about $0.8 billion to $1.35 billion depending on the research house. Nobody's number is authoritative, including the government's.

Operator tax

50% IEPS since January 1, 2026 (30% before). Offshore books pay it on gross receipts with no prize deduction, plus 16% VAT. States add 10% on player spend

License economics

SEGOB permit under the 1947 act. Mexico has no standalone online license, so online betting rides on an establishment permit. Slot permits have been non-renewable since November 2023

Regulator

SEGOBSecretaría de Gobernación

Enforcement reaches

no site or payment blocking

Direct acquiring

5

A direct relationship with the local rail rather than a hop through someone else's.

  • Rails: SPEI, OXXO Pay, CoDi / DiMo

  • Rails: SPEI, OXXO Pay

  • Rails: OXXO Pay, SPEI, Local cards

  • Rails: SPEI, OXXO Pay

  • Rails: SPEI, OXXOOXXO (cash voucher), SafetyPay bank transfer

Aggregated or indirect

15

Reached through open banking, an aggregator, a partner PSP or a wallet rather than through the provider's own local acquiring.

Markets with the same payment rails

Markets where players pay on the same kind of rail