Skip to content

78 providers

ArticleDeep-dive

AMLA and iGaming: The New EU AML Rules Land on Your PSP First

AMLA can never directly supervise a gambling operator, because the law limits selection to credit and financial institutions. Cross-border PSPs, EMIs and CASPs that move gambling money can be selected in 2027, and their maximum fine can be no lower than EUR 10 million or 10% of turnover.
Editorial TeamUpdated iGaming Payment Solutions
Updated 8 min read
Contents6 sections
  1. Can AMLA supervise gambling operators?
  2. AMLA and AMLR timeline for gambling operators and PSPs
  3. AMLR rules for gambling operators from July 10, 2027
  4. AMLA direct supervision of PSPs and EMIs: selection criteria and fines
  5. AMLA risk methodology for gambling operators under Article 40(2) AMLD6
  6. What iGaming operators should do before July 10, 2027

, the EU's , selects no company for direct supervision in 2026. Its first selection must start by July 1, 2027. It plans to name up to 40 high-risk groups and entities, drawn only from credit and financial institutions, and to take over their AML supervision by July 2028. Gambling operators come under the EU's single AML rulebook in Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (the ), which binds them directly across the EU from July 10, 2027.

The payment institutions, e-money institutions and crypto-asset service providers that move gambling money count as financial institutions, so can select them, and the sixth AML directive () makes member states set a higher minimum fine ceiling for them than for operators. 's regime therefore reaches gambling by two routes: harmonized rules at the operator, enforced by national supervisors, and direct supervision of the cross-border PSPs that selects.

Can AMLA supervise gambling operators?

No. Articles 12 and 13 of the AMLA Regulation, (EU) 2024/1620, limit direct supervision to credit institutions and financial institutions that operate in at least six member states and carry a high-risk profile. Gambling providers are obliged entities under the , but they enter through Article 3, point (3)(g), the non-financial branch of the list, and no legal route leads from that branch onto the selection list.

The first selection runs on eligibility data that national supervisors gather on cross-border credit and financial institutions, and the provisional list of eligible entities that builds from it stays internal. Under Article 13(4) the selection must end within 6 months of its start, and Article 13(2) lets select more than 40 where more entities meet the criteria.

will run that selection with a staff set to grow from 120 at the end of 2025 to 432 by the end of 2027. The authority has existed legally since June 26, 2024, and began operating in Frankfurt in summer 2025, when its founding regulation applied in full. Its Chair, Bruna Szego, took office in February 2025.

AMLA and AMLR timeline for gambling operators and PSPs

delivers its Level-2 rulebook in stages.

DateWhat happens
Jul 10, 2025First part of AMLD6 (Article 74) due in national law
Dec 18, 2025AMLA finalized its draft standards on selecting entities for direct supervision (Article 12(7) of Regulation 2024/1620) and on how supervisors score the risk profile of credit and financial institutions (Article 40(2) AMLD6)
Jul 8, 2026AMLA finalized the draft RTS under Article 53(10) AMLD6, a four‑tier breach‑gravity scale for national supervisors to apply when they set sanctions
Jul 13 to Sep 27, 2026AMLA consulted on its draft risk‑scoring methodology for non‑financial obliged entities, online and land‑based gambling included, and held a public hearing on Sep 10
Aug 15, 2026Deadline for national supervisors to send AMLA eligibility data on cross‑border credit and financial institutions, with an internal provisional list of eligible entities planned for the end of September
Oct 1, 2026AMLA finalized the draft RTS on customer due diligence (Article 28(1) AMLR), on business relationships and occasional and linked transactions (Article 19(9)) and on group‑wide requirements (Articles 16(4) and 17(3))
Mar 31, 2027National supervisors close the second eligibility data collection, with Dec 31, 2026 as the reference date
Jul 1, 2027Latest start of the first selection (up to 40 groups and entities)
Jul 10, 2027AMLR applies. Gambling operators become obliged entities under the single rulebook, and the EUR 10,000 cash cap takes effect
Late 2027AMLA names the entities it will supervise directly
July 2028AMLA takes over direct supervision of the selected entities
Dec 31, 2028AMLA's risk methodology for non‑financial obliged entities, gambling operators included, applies under the draft

AMLR rules for gambling operators from July 10, 2027

The gives gambling services their first statutory definition in a directly applicable EU regulation and ties the due-diligence trigger to the payment flow, which makes it a cashier project for operators.

Article 19(5) is the provision a cashier team builds around. Customer due diligence is mandatory "upon the collection of winnings, the wagering of a stake, or both" for transactions of at least EUR 2,000, carried out in a single operation or in linked transactions. The trigger works on money going in and money coming out, and the linked-transactions clause stops a player from dodging the threshold by splitting. The draft standard AMLA finalized on October 1, 2026, under Article 19(9), sets the criteria for identifying linked transactions. Catching 4 x EUR 600 across 3 days is therefore a transaction-monitoring job for the payment stack.

Two other provisions call for a compliance owner's attention now. Article 4 lets member states exempt some gambling services on proven low risk, but it excludes casinos, online gambling and betting from any exemption, so the core of the sector cannot be carved out anywhere in the EU. Article 34 sets the enhanced due diligence measures for higher-risk customers, extra checks on source of funds and source of wealth among them, and VIP programs at gambling operators fall under those general rules. The extra layer for the very wealthy in Article 34(5) applies to higher-risk relationships where at least EUR 5 million in assets runs through personalized services for a customer holding at least EUR 50 million, and it binds only credit institutions, financial institutions and trust or company service providers.

AMLA direct supervision of PSPs and EMIs: selection criteria and fines

For a payment institution, e-money institution or CASP, selection turns on two criteria: activity in at least six member states and a high residual risk profile under the draft selection methodology finalized on December 18, 2025. has published no sector list and named no candidates. An EMI that serves merchants in six or more member states under its passport, with a book weighted toward gambling and crypto, fits both criteria.

EUR 10M or 10%

of annual turnover, the lowest maximum fine AMLD6 lets member states set for credit and financial institutions

For non-financial obliged entities, gambling operators included, the maximum fine must reach at least twice the benefit derived from the breach or EUR 1 million. The processor faces the bigger number (Article 55, Directive (EU) 2024/1640).

A selected PSP answers to directly, and Article 22 of Regulation 2024/1620 lets fine it up to 10% of total annual turnover for breaches of customer due diligence, internal policies or reporting duties. An unselected PSP stays with its national supervisor under the same harmonized rules. 's December 2025 draft standard under Article 40(2) sets how that supervisor will score the PSP's risk. Under Article 53(10) , the draft standard finalized on July 8, 2026, grades breaches on a four-tier gravity scale, and the top two tiers count automatically as "serious, repeated or systematic," the trigger for maximum sanctions.

Either way, a PSP's AML controls will be examined against one European grid, and a PSP that fails it puts the settlement of the operator's float at risk. An operator that runs most of its volume through one acquirer or one bank, the concentration trap in iGaming treasury, now carries that regulatory risk on top of the commercial one.

AMLA risk methodology for gambling operators under Article 40(2) AMLD6

From July 13 to September 27, 2026, consulted on the draft RTS under Article 40(2) of AMLD6 that gives national supervisors a common methodology to score the inherent and residual ML/TF risk of non-financial obliged entities. Gambling, online and land-based, is covered expressly. held the public hearing on September 10 and next sends its final report to the European Commission. Under the draft, collects calibration data from a sample of entities in 2027, and the methodology applies from December 31, 2028.

A Maltese or Swedish operator keeps its national AML supervisor. From that date the supervisor scores the operator on 's methodology, and oversees the supervisor.

What iGaming operators should do before July 10, 2027

Wire the EUR 2,000 stake-and-winnings trigger into cashier monitoring instead of leaving it to a back-office lookup, and build the linked-transaction aggregation to the standard finalized on October 1, 2026. A monitoring change like that takes a year to build and tune.

Put the question to every EU payment partner at the next commercial review: whether it expects to meet the six-member-state criterion, what its residual-risk self-assessment shows, and what its plan is if selection puts it under supervision in 2028. The answer prices the continuity risk on the operator's float. Of the 78 providers rated here, 69 run their own automated or semi-automated KYC and AML tooling, and the same review should ask how that tooling will score on the harmonized inspection grid.

Sources (11)

  1. 01Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR), Official Journal
  2. 02Directive (EU) 2024/1640 (AMLD6), Official Journal
  3. 03Regulation (EU) 2024/1620 (AMLA Regulation), Official Journal
  4. 04AMLA: about the Authority
  5. 05AMLA: Single Programming Document 2026-2028 (Feb 4, 2026)
  6. 06AMLA: next step toward 2027 selection of entities for direct supervision (May 12, 2026)
  7. 07AMLA: selection methodology and supervisory risk standards finalized (Dec 18, 2025)
  8. 08AMLA final report: RTS under Article 53(10) AMLD6, breach gravity and sanctions (Jul 8, 2026)
  9. 09AMLA consultation: risk-profile methodology for non-financial obliged entities (Jul 13 to Sep 27, 2026)
  10. 10AMLA consultation paper: draft RTS under Article 40(2) AMLD6 (Jul 13, 2026)
  11. 11AMLA: standards for the private sector finalized (Oct 1, 2026)