Skip to content
iGaming Payment Solutions

77 providers

The jurisdiction that sells the license, not the player · Verified 2026-09-03

iGaming payments in Malta

Malta licenses 302 gaming companies and lives off it: gaming is 6.3% of the island's output and 15,039 jobs among 588,000 people, and the last time the regulator measured what its own residents spend was a survey of 2017, because next to the hub they are a rounding error. What Malta sells is the license, priced as a compliance contribution on worldwide revenue, and 2026 is testing what that license is still worth. On 1 October the tax on the few Maltese players triples for casino. In Luxembourg the Advocate General has told the Court of Justice that, if it reaches the question, an MGA license is, in principle, valid only in Malta, with Article 56A, the 2023 law that stops Maltese courts enforcing foreign refund judgments, on the line. And the industry's home banks still file it under restricted: Bank of Valletta admits online gaming only after enhanced due diligence, and HSBC Malta, which has refused online-gaming credit-card transactions since 2014, is being sold. The money runs through Maltese e-money institutions, Malta-based acquirers, and Revolut, which by its own 2024 count sits on the phones of 68% of Maltese adults.

betting: regulatedcasino: regulatedSee it on the map
Local cardsVerified DataBy the iGaming Payment Solutions Editorial Team

5

Rails tracked

EUR

Settles in

regulated

Online casino

MGA

Regulator

Quick info

Currency
EUR
Region
Europe
Betting
regulated
Casino
regulated
Dominant rail
Local cards
Providers
0 (0 direct)
Regulator
MGA
Enforcement
no active blocking recorded

A regulator that counts its licensees, not its players

The B2B majority, the surrender queue, and the number the MGA does not print

302

Licensed companies, end-2025

311 licenses across online and land-based; 350 companies and 358 licenses at the end-2022 peak, on a count that has included suspended licenses since 2022

6.3%

Of Malta's output

EUR 1,422 million of gross value added in 2025, 8.2% with the spillovers counted

15,039

Full-time jobs at MGA licensees

Up 4.8% in a year; three quarters of the staff on MGA-licensed online activity are not Maltese

588,254

People on the island

Roughly 504,000 of them adults on the statistics office's age split; the annual report carries no line for what they spend online

The Malta Gaming Authority's annual reports track gross value added, employment, license counts and the fees it collects. They carry no line for gross gaming revenue from Maltese residents online. The Authority's own consumption surveys covered 2015, when 56% of adults spent about EUR 125 million, and 2017, when 52.8% spent EUR 128 million with the National Lottery taking three quarters of it; nothing has followed.

B2C online licenses

187
End 2022
155
End 2023
147
End 2024
131
End 2025
The B2C base has fallen by 56 in three years while B2B critical-supply licenses rose from 160 to 171, and from 68 in 2018. Surrenders do the shrinking: licensees handed back 28 licenses of every class in 2025 against 2 cancellations by the MGA, which describes it as strategic consolidation and operators aligning their licensing across jurisdictions, and in its outlook names the spread of point-of-consumption licensing. Its own take from the online segment in contributions, fees and the 5% consumption tax fell from EUR 46.8 million in 2022 to EUR 38.2 million in 2025, which the Authority ties to the same B2C-to-B2B shift.

Read the two curves together and the hub's shape in 2026 is clear. Malta is turning from a place where operators hold their primary license into a place where platforms, studios and payment intermediaries hold theirs, and where an operator licensed elsewhere in the EU keeps a Maltese footprint through a Recognition Notice at EUR 5,000 a year, of which the MGA issued 32 in 2025. The MGA writes this down itself: a growing number of jurisdictions require local licenses, operators are adopting multi-jurisdictional strategies, and the sector is moving from a license-driven to a service-driven model. For a payments reader the consequence is that the counterparty on a Maltese license is more often a B2B supplier than a book, and the book behind it may be licensed in three other countries whose rules on the cashier override Malta's.

A price list on worldwide revenue, and a credential on trial in Luxembourg

Compliance contribution, capital rules, and Article 56A

A B2C license costs EUR 5,000 to apply for and EUR 25,000 a year to hold, and the real price is the compliance contribution charged monthly on gaming revenue wherever it was earned: for casino, 1.25% of the first EUR 3 million sliding to 0.40% above EUR 30 million, capped at EUR 375,000 per license period; for fixed-odds betting, 4% of the first EUR 3 million sliding to 0.40%, capped at EUR 600,000. The bands have not moved since the fee regulations took effect in January 2018. What has moved is the balance-sheet test. The EUR 100,000 share-capital floor for Type 1 and Type 2 is older; what the capital policy of 2 July 2025 added is positive equity: a negative balance at year end has six months to be repaired, with up to five years for holes that already existed at the end of 2024. A B2B supplier pays EUR 25,000 to EUR 35,000 a year by revenue band and no contribution at all, which is one more reason the base is tilting toward B2B.

  1. June 2023in force

    Act XXI of 2023 adds Article 56A: Maltese courts shall refuse to recognize foreign judgments against a licensee for lawful, licensed activity

  2. 27 Feb 2025done

    First Hall of the Civil Court refuses to enforce two Austrian refund judgments against MGA licensees, citing Article 56A and the public-policy ground in Brussels I

  3. 18 Jun 2025done

    European Commission opens infringement INFR(2025)2100 with a letter of formal notice; the MGA replies that the article codifies existing public policy

  4. 16 Apr 2026done

    CJEU in C-440/23: an operator's Maltese license is not enough to show that Germany's pre-2021 online casino ban was inconsistent; void contracts and refunds of lost stakes are allowed

  5. 23 Apr 2026done

    Advocate General Emiliou in C-683/24 proposes that the Austrian reference is inadmissible, and, should the Court decide it anyway, that a Maltese license is, in principle, valid only in Malta and a rule like Article 56A is manifestly incompatible with Brussels I bis

  6. Judgment pendingahead

    No date set for the judgment in C-683/24; no reasoned opinion has followed the Commission's formal notice

Article 56A is Malta's answer to the refund industry: Austrian and German players suing licensees for stakes lost on sites that were illegal where the player sat. The shield works inside Malta. It has never worked outside it, and the Court of Justice may say whether it can exist at all, if it gets past the question of admissibility.

The industry's home banks file it under restricted

Bank of Valletta's list, HSBC's exit, and the institutions that actually hold the money

Malta's largest bank keeps online gaming and betting on its restricted-categories list, not the prohibited one: Bank of Valletta accepts a gaming company after enhanced due diligence, case by case, with no published criteria, and refuses professional gamblers as customers outright. The last time it moved at scale was October 2019, when it began a de-risking exercise its chief executive described as a new risk profile agreed with the European Central Bank, gave licensees such as YoBetIt two months to move their funds and fifteen days before their cards stopped, then conceded that some of the letters had gone to clients who should never have received them. The second bank left earlier and more quietly. HSBC Malta's refusal of credit-card transactions for online gaming became public in May 2014, and on 23 December 2025 HSBC Continental Europe signed the sale of its 70% stake in HSBC Malta to Greece's CrediaBank for EUR 200 million, a deal HSBC Malta's chief executive said in August 2026 he expects to close in the second quarter of 2027. APS, Lombard, MeDirect, FIMBank and Sparkasse take no public position on gaming; Sparkasse's 2025 annual report does not contain the word.

InstitutionWhat it isPosition on gamingRead in 2026
Bank of VallettaCredit institution, ECB-supervised, 25% state-ownedRestricted category; enhanced due diligence, case by case; BOV Accept acquiring only where the merchant is explicitly authorizedThe one bank operators name; SEPA Instant outward since 6 October 2025
HSBC MaltaCredit institution, second largest by assetsOnline-gaming credit-card transactions refused since 2014Sale to CrediaBank signed 23 December 2025, closing expected Q2 2027
FinXPMFSA e-money institution, founded 2014, Mastercard principal memberServes gaming; the only Tier 1 profile in our banking sectionNamed client on record; profiled in the banking section below
Finance Incorporated (Paymix)MFSA financial institution since 2014, payment and e-moneyLists gaming, gaming auxiliary and crypto as served industriesRetail and corporate accounts, cards, POS
Trust Payments (Malta)MFSA financial institution since 2012, Visa and Mastercard principal memberGaming acquirer; Romanian Class 2 license announced April 2024 for ONJN booksReviewed in the catalog; a Malta-based acquiring route for MGA books
Truevo PaymentsMFSA financial institution, card acquirerGambling vertical; named 1xBet as a client in 2020Merchant must be licensed where it sits and in every country it takes players from, per its own acceptable-use policy
PayhoundMFSA financial institution plus MiCA CASP since 24 November 2025Names iGaming: crypto deposits without the operator holding the assetsThe Maltese route for a crypto cashier under the MGA's DLT policy

Positions are the institutions' own published policies and pages. None of the five smaller banks publishes a gaming policy in either direction. FinXP and Bank of Valletta are profiled in the banking section; Trust Payments in the catalog.

The Player Protection Directive explains why an e-money institution, not a bank, is the normal home for an MGA licensee's money. Player funds must sit at a licensed credit, financial or payment institution in Malta, the EEA or another jurisdiction the Authority approves, the arrangement needs the Authority's approval, the balance may never fall below 90% of what players are owed with the rest allowed in transit, and the MGA keeps viewing rights on the account. A licensee that a Maltese bank turns away can satisfy every word of that with a Maltese or Lithuanian EMI. The Authority's own balance sheet carries EUR 8.7 million of player funds passed to it from accounts dormant for more than 30 months and from surrendered licenses. The institutions that pass our register test are profiled in the banking section, Bank of Valletta and FinXP among them, and Trust Payments in the catalog; what MGA licensed actually means on a payment company's website is in MGA-licensed payment providers.

Notify and veto: any provider you told the MGA about, until it says stop

Directive 3 of 2018, Article 45, and what MGA books actually run

The MGA approves no payment method and licenses no payment company; what it approves is where player funds sit. Article 45 of the Gaming Authorisations and Compliance Directive lets a licensee take and make payments through any provider it has notified to the Authority and that the Authority has not told it to stop using. Adding or dropping a method or a provider is notified within 30 days of the change under Article 37; the risk rating the licensee assigns to a method feeds the risk rating of the player using it. Around that sit the rules that do bind the cashier: no credit from the operator, ever; withdrawals within five working days where practicable and back to the originating account where possible; customer due diligence at EUR 2,000 of cumulative deposits, lifetime or in any 180 days, under the FIAU's remote-gaming procedures; and a Player Funds Report to the Authority every month, 1,757 of them in 2025.

RailShare of deposits, 2025Share of withdrawals, 2025
Cards44.3%10.7%
Bank transfer34.5%68.5%
E-wallets and online accounts14.6%16.8%
Other6.5%4.0%

MGA Annual Report 2025, all licensees, all markets. The 2024 mix had bank transfer first at 51.7% and cards at 26.1%. The swing reads as a change in who holds a license rather than in how anyone pays: active player accounts across the base fell from 39.7 million to 13.8 million in the same year, a drop the MGA puts down to licensing strategies and regulatory change across jurisdictions.

  • Visa/Mastercarddominant

    local cards

    Cards led deposits across MGA licensees in 2025 at 44.3%, and at Maltese-facing cashiers they come first: IZIBET takes credit and debit cards from EUR 20, Betsson from EUR 10. No credit-card ban exists; the Gaming Act only forbids the operator itself extending credit. Acquiring under an MGA license sits with Malta-based acquirers such as Trust Payments (Malta) and Truevo, and with BOV Accept only where the bank explicitly authorizes the merchant.

  • Revolutdominant

    e-wallet

    Revolut puts 68% of Maltese adults, about 300,000 people, on its books (July 2024), which makes it the closest thing Malta has to a domestic instant rail. IZIBET takes Revolut deposits and pays out to Revolut instantly, against one to four days for cards and three to five for a bank transfer.

  • SEPA bank transfermajor

    bank transfer

    34.5% of deposits and 68.5% of withdrawals across MGA licensees in 2025, the default payout rail. Sending SEPA Instant became mandatory for euro-area banks on 9 October 2025; Bank of Valletta switched outward instant payments on from 6 October 2025 at no extra charge, with Verification of Payee.

  • Skrill / Neteller / Payzmajor

    e-wallet

    14.6% of deposits and 16.8% of withdrawals MGA-wide in 2025. IZIBET and Betsson both carry the Paysafe pair, with Payz beside them.

  • paysafecardminor

    vouchers & cash

    Cash still pays for 67% of point-of-sale transactions in Malta by count (ECB SPACE 2024), the highest band in the euro area, but the voucher rail barely reaches the cashier: Betsson lists paysafecard; IZIBET does not.

Two approvals per crypto cashier, and nine register entries in the month before the cliff

The DLT policy, the MiCA register, and the peer review that named no names

  1. 1

    The MGA approves the setup

    Since 30 January 2023 a licensee needs the Authority's prior approval for any deposit setup with crypto on either side: crypto received as crypto, crypto received as fiat, fiat received as crypto. Coins with built-in anonymization are prohibited outright, and the platform may not function as an exchange.

  2. 2

    The provider must be authorized

    The policy allows only service providers authorized under Maltese law, which since 1 July 2026 means a MiCA crypto-asset service provider. Payhound, BVNK's Maltese entity and OpenPayd's OP Digital Services are on that register; the operator's cashier is not.

  3. 3

    Limits count in euros

    The player's limits under the Player Protection Directive, set in fiat, apply to crypto deposits at their fiat value, cumulatively with fiat deposits; a deposit that would breach one is rejected, or the excess returned to the player.

Malta's financial regulator put 22 entries on the MiCA register by August 2026, 20 authorizations and two Article 60 notifications, nine of them between 29 May and 30 June, the month before the transitional period closed: OpenPayd's OP Digital Services, Strike, FalconX, Xcoins, Bequant among them, after BVNK's System Pay Services (Malta) in February. Two things frame that list. In July 2025 ESMA published a fast-track peer review of the MFSA, prompted by events it did not describe, which questioned the timing of one authorization granted while material issues were unresolved, and credited the authority with adequate expertise and resources. And in March 2026 the MGA put crypto assets in online gaming on its supervisory agenda for the year, alongside cash, as a thematic review of internal controls. The routes that pass both regulators are on the crypto gateways page; the register logic is in MiCA and the CASP cliff.

Half a million adults, cash at the till, Revolut on the phone

What the domestic cashier looks like, and the rules that shape it

Any MGA licensee may take Maltese residents by default; the price is the gaming tax on that revenue. Malta pays cash for 67% of purchases at the till by count, the highest band in the euro area in the ECB's 2024 survey, and carries Revolut on 68% of its adults by Revolut's own 2024 count, so the domestic cashier is cards first, Revolut second, and a wallet pair from Paysafe behind them. IZIBET, run by IZI Interactive under an ordinary B2C license from 2016 rather than the lottery concession, takes Visa, Mastercard, Maestro, Skrill, Neteller, Revolut and Payz from EUR 20 with no fee, and pays Revolut and wallets instantly against one to four days for a card and three to five for a bank transfer; the National Lottery's online casino, same company, same license, shows the same logos plus bank transfer. Betsson's cashier adds paysafecard on the way in and Trustly on the way out, from EUR 10. Nothing in Maltese law bans credit cards at a cashier; the Gaming Act only bans the operator extending credit. There is no affordability rule, no statutory deposit cap, and no unified self-exclusion register online, only the land-based one: the Player Protection Directive requires an operator to offer limits and ask about them before the first deposit, and the MGA's mystery-shopping review of 2025, published in February 2026, found four of twenty licensees failing to prompt for limits at registration or first deposit and three letting a self-excluded player open an account at a sister brand.

CashierDepositsPayoutsMinimum
IZIBET (IZI Interactive); the lottery's online casino shows the same logos plus bank transferVisa, Mastercard, Maestro, Skrill, Neteller, Revolut, Payz; no Apple Pay, no paysafecard, no TrustlyRevolut and wallets instant once the account is verified; cards one to four days; bank transfer three to five daysEUR 20, maximum EUR 50,000
Betsson (MGA); a group-wide list, not a Maltese oneVisa, Mastercard, Maestro, Skrill, Neteller, Payz (still labeled ecoPayz), paysafecardBank transfer, cards, Skrill, Neteller, TrustlyEUR 10 in, EUR 20 out
LeoVegas (MGA)Card and wallet set not published for MaltaNot publishedEUR 10

Read from the operators' own help pages in September 2026. The land-based side is a different country: a Maltese citizen under 25 may not play at a casino, Maltese visits to the four casinos fell 13% in each of the last two years, and the lottery's 309 outlets take cash with a EUR 6,000 ceiling per ticket on a counter payout.

The tax on the few Maltese players triples, and VAT comes in through the side door

Legal Notices 84 and 86 of 2026

Gaming tax on Maltese-player revenueUntil 30 September 2026From 1 October 2026
Online casino (Type 1)5% of gaming revenue15% of gaming revenue
Online betting, pool, skill (Types 2 to 4)5%10%
Casino floor5% plus a device levy of 30% (Types 1 and 2) or 12.5% (Types 3 and 4)15% or 10% by type, levy abolished
Gaming parlors and junkets5% plus a device levy of 15% (parlors) or 2.5% (junkets)5%, levy abolished
Who is a Maltese playerPhysically in Malta; for distance gaming, established or resident in MaltaUnchanged
Studio levy on a B2B streaming from MaltaEUR 500 a year, waived where a device levy was paidEUR 3,000 a year, critical-supply licensees only
VAT on remote gamblingExempt as gamblingExempt only for categories the minister approves; most remote B2C supplies become taxable with input VAT recovery

For a book with a real Maltese customer base the arithmetic is unpleasant but small, because the base is small: the MGA collected EUR 21.5 million in contributions, fees and tax from the National Lottery in 2025 and EUR 21.6 million from the four casinos, and those are the only operators whose Maltese revenue the Authority publishes. For an online book the change lands in the data more than the ledger. Taxability for distance gaming turns on where the player is established or resides, which the regulations already said, so the address and residence fields in the KYC and payment stack decide what is taxable, and a book that treats a Maltese IBAN or a Maltese card BIN as a residence signal without a rule for it will over- or under-declare from the first return. Corporate-group licensees are taxed as one person. The VAT side is the larger structural shift: Legal Notice 86 narrows the exemption to what the minister approves, and the tax authority's April guidelines approve low-risk games, occasional junkets and on-site betting at sporting events, so a remote casino's supplies fall under ordinary place-of-supply rules and its input VAT becomes recoverable.

Operator tax

5% of gaming revenue from players in Malta until 30 Sep 2026; from 1 Oct 2026, 15% for Type 1 (casino) and 10% for Types 2-4 (LN 84/2026), device levy abolished. The license itself is paid for through a compliance contribution on worldwide gaming revenue, 0.4% to 4% by game type, capped at EUR375,000 (Type 1) to EUR600,000 (Type 2) per license period

License economics

B2C license: EUR5,000 application, EUR25,000 annual fixed fee; EUR100,000 share capital for Type 1 and 2, with positive equity required since the capital policy of 2 Jul 2025; payment providers notified to the MGA within 30 days of a change, subject to its veto; player funds at an MGA-approved institution covering player balances at all times, at least 90% on the account itself

Regulator

MGAMalta Gaming Authority

Enforcement reaches

no active blocking recorded
  1. Oct 1, 2026

    gaming tax triples for Type 1, device levy goes

  2. Every dated obligation we track sits on the compliance calendar.

What an MGA licensee should be able to show a payment company

The file, in the order the regulators check it

The MGA cancelled two licenses in 2025 and at least one in 2026, and the largest FIAU gaming penalty published in 2026 was for a deposit-tracking failure. Each of these is a document, not a promise.

  • The license, live on the MGA register, and absent from the enforcement register

    Winzon Group lost its license with effect from 11 March 2026 under the no-notice proviso, was ordered to refund every player and hand over transaction reports and bank statements, and owed EUR 147,080 in penalties. A PSP holding its flows learned this from the notice on 7 April.

  • The player-funds arrangement the Authority approved, and the last monthly Player Funds Report

    Article 31 of the Player Protection Directive makes the setup subject to MGA approval; the balance must cover player liabilities at any time, and the report lands monthly. An operator that cannot produce the approval letter is holding player money somewhere the Authority has not seen.

  • Proof that you, the provider, were notified to the MGA

    Article 45 of Directive 3 of 2018 permits payments only through notified providers the Authority has not vetoed, and Article 37 gives the licensee 30 days from a change to notify it. A provider that was never notified is one the directive does not allow.

  • The DLT approval letter, if any crypto touches the cashier

    The 2023 policy requires prior approval for each crypto deposit setup and an authorized provider behind it; the MGA's 2026 supervisory plan puts crypto controls under thematic review.

  • An MGA-approved MLRO and the EUR 2,000 cumulative-deposit process, across every brand and channel

    Stanleybet Malta, a remote licensee with betting shops across the EU, drew EUR 225,730 plus EUR 2,000 a day on 23 March 2026 because its shops could not link one customer's deposits to spot the threshold; the penalty is under appeal. The 2024 thematic review found half of MLROs unsure what to do when due diligence is still incomplete 30 days after it.

  • Positive equity and EUR 100,000 of paid-up capital under the July 2025 policy

    Negative equity at year end must be repaired within six months, and the audited statements due within 180 days of year end must show the player-funds balance separately.

  • A list of the markets where this license is the only license, with the refund exposure priced

    After C-440/23 a German or Austrian player can void the contract and reclaim stakes in a home court; Article 56A stops enforcement in Malta and nowhere else, and the Court of Justice is deciding whether it survives at all.

Markets that run on the same rail

Where a cashier built for this market mostly transfers, and where it does not